Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2023edits #172

Merged
merged 30 commits into from
Sep 6, 2023
Merged

2023edits #172

merged 30 commits into from
Sep 6, 2023

Conversation

jerstlouis
Copy link
Member

@jerstlouis jerstlouis commented Aug 31, 2023

Proposed draft iteration for OGC API - Coverages, for which I hope to soon hold a SWG vote to approve merging these changes.

19-087.pdf

The main changes is getting rid of all /coverage/* resources, with a JSON Schema at /schema replacing the CIS RangeType resource, and the collection description extent with its uniform additional dimension capabilities and grid property replacing the CIS DomainSet. It isolates the dependency on the Coverage Implementation Schema to the CIS JSON requirement class.
The document was also significantly shortened and simplified overall, while also adding new draft requirement classes for the different encodings (currently a short stub in many cases), for selecting an output CRS, and for scenes making up a coverage.

- This fixes warnings with the asciidoc execution.
- Also no longer including DomainSet subset.
  The only case where subsetting the domain is useful is potentially for irregular grids, though the number of coordinates to list should not be too extensive.
  The other case is point clouds, where XYZ coordinates must be retrieved for every single point, but in this case using LAS/LAZ subset directly with the coverage request
  is probably more appropriate. Therefore, we may want to omit this requirements class from Part 1, and rethink whether it is needed in the future.
- Either not included, or redundant
- Matching clause numbers with generated section numbers
- Starting to regroup requirements / recommendations / permissions directly within the requirements class file,
  with the clause section simply containing an overview sub-section and including the requirements class file.
- Directly including the examples in the annex and referencing the section of the examples annex in the sections
- Update to overview text
- Updating conventions, overview to remove /coverage/* resource and add /coverage/schema resource
- Moving CIS-specific content from overview to CIS JSON encoding req. class
2-conformance: summary tables
@jerstlouis
Copy link
Member Author

jerstlouis commented Sep 6, 2023

2023-09-06: Motion to merge these edits

Motion: Amy
Second: Joan
(note: Stephan has not participated in recent meetings, therefore we temporarily make him a non-voting member for the purpose of achieving quorum)
Discussion: None
There was NOTUC.

Present: Carl, Joan, Tom, Amy, Jerome

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Core release
  
Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant