Skip to content

Minutes

Stephan Meißl edited this page Sep 11, 2020 · 25 revisions

Minutes of various meetings

It was pointed out to me that I have to change the access configuration to the GoToMeeting recordings to be more restrictive. Thus I'm discontinuing the minutes here and will instead upload the recordings to the OGC portal.

Teleconference 20200708

Agenda

  • WCS 2.1 schemas (see mail from Gobe with subject "[WCS.swg] WCS and CIS schemas changes ready for review" from May 1st)
  • OAPI Coverages
  • Status Open Actions
  • AOB
  • Next meeting on July 15th, 9am EDT / 3pm CEST

Attendees

Amy, Chris, Chuck, Gobe, Jerome, Peter, Stephan

Minutes/Recording

GoToMeeting

Actions

None

Teleconference 20200701

Agenda

Attendees

Amy, Chuck, Jerome, Peter, Stephan

Minutes/Recording

GoToMeeting

Motion: The WCS SWG recommends the draft charter (https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc_api_coverages/blob/master/charter/OGC-Coverages-SWG-Charter.adoc) to the TC for a TC electronic vote Moved: Stephan Second: Peter Discussion: Pending final edits Result: Passed with NOTUC

Actions

  • SM: Inform OGC staff about draft charter motion and ask Greg where and how to release it

Draft charter editing session 20200625

Agenda

  • Joint editing of the draft charter

Attendees

Chuck, Gobe, James, Peter, Stephan

Minutes/Recording

GoToMeeting

Teleconference 20200624

Agenda

Attendees

Amy, Chris, Chuck, Gobe, Kevin, Pete, Peter, Tom, Stephan

Minutes/Recording

GoToMeeting

Actions

None

Teleconference 20200610

Agenda

Attendees

Asmund, Greg, Keith, Gobe, Chuck, George, Amy, Jerome, Tom, Dough, Peter (from 9am), Stephan

Minutes/Recording

GoToMeeting

Decision about WCS 2.1 schemas deferred by one week to give Peter and Pete who volunteered to review the changes enough time to review it.

Charter: Discussion about re-chartering or forming a new SWG New SWG: Longer process (3 months) during which WCS SWG would continue to work on OAPICov Re-charter: Need to take on old WCS & extensions work A motion for re-chartering was made.

Invitation to attend the OGC-NA session next Friday, 3am EDT.

Actions

  • SM: Send re-chartering motion to WCS SWG

Teleconference 20200603

Agenda

Attendees

Chris, Chuck, Gobe (2nd half), Jerome, Peter V., Tom, Stephan

Minutes/Recording

GoToMeeting

Actions

None

Teleconference 20200527

Agenda

  • WCS 2.1 schemas - e-mail vote until May 29 (see mail from Gobe with subject "[WCS.swg] WCS and CIS schemas changes ready for review" from May 1st)
  • OAPI Coverages planning
    • Discuss proposal from Jerome to move /all directly under /{coverageid}
    • Status of planned sprints
    • Identify and assign next steps
  • Status Open Actions
    • CoverageJSON work item draft - Chris
    • Abstract Topic 6 (= ISO 19123-1) work item draft - Peter
    • SWG info harmonization - Stephan
    • Liaison with ISO: Raise issue with OAB to liaise with CRS SWG and others - George
  • AOB
  • Next meeting on June 3rd

Attendees

Gobe, Jerome, Tom, Stephan

Minutes/Recording

GoToMeeting

Jerome volunteered to work an a pull request to fully incorporate the discussed OAPI Common Part 2 Collections. See https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc_api_coverages/issues/64 for details and discussion.

Actions

  • Jerome: Work on #64

Teleconference 20200520

Agenda

  • WCS 2.1 schemas - 3 week review period closing on May 22 (see mail from Gobe with subject "[WCS.swg] WCS and CIS schemas changes ready for review" from May 1st)
  • OAPI Coverages planning
    • Merge open pull requests
    • Status of planned sprints
    • Identify and assign next steps
  • Status Open Actions
    • Check how OGC can help facilitate the ESIP sponsorship - Gobe
    • CoverageJSON work item draft - Chris
    • Abstract Topic 6 (= ISO 19123-1) work item draft - Peter
    • SWG info harmonization - Stephan
    • Liaison with ISO: Raise issue with OAB to liaise with CRS SWG and others - George
  • AOB
  • Next meeting on May 27th

Attendees

Gobe, Jerome, Chuck, Tom, Chris, Aleksandar, Stephan

Minutes/Recording

GoToMeeting

WCS 2.1 schemas: Send email vote asking for objection to unanimous consent. Proposed to reduce the voting period to 1 week given that there were 3 weeks of review period.

Status of planned sprints

  • Gobe: ESIP sprint is not confirmed yet. Potential funding for participants? It is not in line with ESIP RfP. There is maybe a possibility in the frame of an OGC innovation event.
  • Tom: OSGeo Community Sprint is possibly happening in November. Worst case is March 2021.
  • Gobe: There will be an OGC sprint that Coverages could join before November.

Actions

  • Stephan: Initiate email vote for WCS 2.1 schemas

Teleconference 20200513

Agenda

  • WCS 2.1 schemas (see mail from Gobe with subject "[WCS.swg] WCS and CIS schemas changes ready for review" from May 1st)
  • OAPI Coverages planning
    • Status of planned sprints
    • Identify and assign next steps
  • Status Open Actions
    • CoverageJSON work item draft - Chris
    • Abstract Topic 6 (= ISO 19123-1) work item draft - Peter
    • SWG info harmonization - Stephan
    • Liaison with ISO: Raise issue with OAB to liaise with CRS SWG and others - George
  • AOB
  • Next meeting on May 20th

Attendees

Gobe, Jerome, Stephan

Minutes/Recording

GoToMeeting

Gobe

Steps

Actions

  • Gobe: Check how OGC can help facilitate the ESIP sponsorship
  • All: Define next steps needed and planning to being able to recommend OAPI Coverages draft for public RFC

Teleconference 20200506

Agenda

  • WCS 2.1 schemas (see mail from Gobe with subject "[WCS.swg] WCS and CIS schemas changes ready for review" from May 1st)
  • OAPI Coverages planning
    • OAPI Common (collections, etc.) - I hope somebody will be there to report from the common meetings.
    • Status of planned sprints
    • Next steps
  • Status Open Actions
    • CoverageJSON work item draft - Chris
    • Abstract Topic 6 (= ISO 19123-1) work item draft - Peter
    • SWG info harmonization - Stephan
    • Liaison with ISO: Raise issue with OAB to liaise with CRS SWG and others - George
  • AOB
  • Next meeting will be on May 13th 2020 at 10am EDT / 4pm CEST

Attendees

Chris, Gobe, Jerome, Tom, Stephan

Minutes/Recording

GoToMeeting

OAPI Common is now split in:

  • Part 1: Core
  • Part 2: Collections
  • Part 3: CRS

EDR decided to steam ahead with their definition of Collections.

Actions

  • Gobe: Check about current planning of anticipated June sprint
  • All: Define next steps needed and planning to being able to recommend the OAPI Coverages draft for public RFC

Teleconference 20200415

Agenda

Attendees

Aleksandar, Gobe, Jerome, Peter, Tom, Stephan

Minutes/Recording

GoToMeeting

Gobe presented 40 issues identified by Kevin (https://portal.ogc.org/files/?artifact_id=92989)

Discussion about Changes:

  • Typos
  • Namespace
    • Peter: Believe OGC-NA should mandate or assign namespaces.
  • Technical points
    • To be discussed via GitHub as proposed by Gobe

Motion to approve process proposed for resolving issues affecting the WCS 2.1 schemas

The WCS SWG approves the process described below for resolving issues affecting the WCS 2.1 schemas.

  1. OGC staff create a private Github/Gitlab repo containing the schema files and examples.
  2. Changes are made to the schema files and examples in a separate Git branch
  3. Pull Request is created when a group of files have been edited
  4. Pull Request is reviewed by the SWG for up to one week a. If there are no objections, the Pull Request is approved b. If there are objections, a SWG telecon is called to discuss the objection We iterate step 2, 3 and 4 until all of the schema files and examples have been revised where necessary. Motion: Peter Second: Stephan Discussion: None Result: NOTUC

Actions

  • Gobe: Initiate GitHub/Gitlab repository

OGC TC meeting in Ottawa on 20200303

Agenda

  • Status update of ongoing OGC API – Coverages work
  • Proposed CoverageJSON work item
  • Liaison with ISO: Status and planning
  • AOB

Attendees

see OGC portal

Minutes/Recording

Actions

  • Action S. Meißl to organize May sprint
  • Action G. Percivall to explore July sprint options
  • Action M. Hedley to update GitHub CoverageJSON repository in OGC organization with latest draft
  • Action C. Little to draft work item description based on motion from Singapore TC
  • Action S. Meißl to talk to TC chair to harmonize WCS SWG, name, charter, and work items
  • Action P. Baumann to draft work item description for Abstract Topic 6 (= ISO 19123-1)
  • Action G. Percivall to raise issue with OAB to liaise with CRS SWG and others
  • Action M. Hedley to draft mail to inform CRS SWG, in particular R. Lott

Teleconference 20200205

Agenda

  • EDR Sprint
  • AOB

Attendees

Chuck, Chris, Peter, Stephan

Minutes/Recording

GoToMeeting

Chris: Explains objectives of EDR API. The SWG is currently working on a first draft version. Stephan: Clarifies the intention of the EDR API Sprint mail targeting the EDR Sprint end of March. The intention is not impose OAPI-Coverages on the EDR API nor to say that OAPI-Coverages is frozen, finalized or anything the like. The EDR Sprint participants should just be aware of the OAPI-Coverages and it is brought to their attention nor normative nor complete.

Actions

  • SM: Write conclusions as follow up to email thread

Teleconference 20200115

Agenda

  • Work on current specification
  • AOB

Attendees

Chuck, Jerome, Stephan

Minutes/Recording

GoToMeeting

Actions

  • SM: Write to Greg to adjust cronjob/script that generates and publishes HTML/PDF
  • GH: Check if OGC has/can have a SwaggerHub account

Teleconference 20200103

Agenda

  • Final ESIP - OGC Sprint preparation
  • AOB

Attendees

Chuck, George, Gobe, Richard, Stephan

Minutes/Recording

GoToMeeting

Actions

  • SM: Make sure Readme.md is in sync with spec. Add note that Readme.md is informative and spec is authoritative source.
  • SM: Write to Greg to adjust cronjob/script that generates and publishes HTML/PDF
  • SM: Add link to Sentinel dataset to sprint repository and send note to gitter channel; link to EDC / Sentinel Hub
  • GH: Check if OGC has/can have a SwaggerHub account
  • All: Please help triaging open issues

Teleconference 20191218

Agenda

Attendees

Chuck, Gobe, Jerome, Stephan

Minutes

  • Agreed on a final meeting ahead of the sprint on January 3rd 2020 at 8am EST 2pm CET

Actions

  • All: Please help triaging open issues

Recording

GoToMeeting

Teleconference 20191211

Agenda

Attendees

Chris, Chuck, Gobe, Jerome, Peter, Richard, Shane, Steve, Stephan

Minutes

  • Do we need coverageType along itemType on collection level?
  • /coverage shall be minimal but include envelope and rangeType but not the full domainSet. In general reuse what we hat in capabilities documents for a coverage.
  • Shall subsetting be part of core or a conformance class of its own?

Actions

  • All: Please help triaging open issues
  • Stephan: Update swagger hub definitions to provide schemas to Chuck (try to include examples), ask for help by Joan if needed

Recording

GoToMeeting

Teleconference 20191204

Agenda

Attendees

Aleksandar, Chris, Chuck, Jerome, Richard, Stephan

Minutes

  • OGC API - Features Part 2 CRS - Chris Little
    • Features core and common default always to CRS84, e.g., bbox
    • 3 different use cases where the CRS is used
      • filter/query
      • output
      • default
    • In coverages distinguish between filtering and subsetting
    • Chuck: bbox and time should be usable on /coverage. Hopefully it is sufficient as currently defined in common.
    • Discussion about tiling and paging
  • ESIP - OGC Sprint preparation
    • Three use cases
    • Invited to bring forward use case

Actions

  • All: Please help triaging open issues

Recording

GoToMeeting

Teleconference 20191127

Agenda

  • ESIP - OGC Sprint preparation
  • AOB

Attendees

Gobe, Jerome, Peter, Stephan

Minutes

  • Added issue to collect points for Common (https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogc_api_coverages/issues/30)
  • http://acme.com/oapi/collections/{collectionid}/coverage agreed to return general description including envelope instead of domainset, rangetype, native format, etc.
  • http://acme.com/oapi/collections/{collectionid}/coverage/all agreed to return whole coverage including domainset, etc. of course supporting additional parameters
  • http://acme.com/oapi/coverage agreed to be removed
  • Peter: Include link to Coverages DWG Wiki page. Discussion about removing link to https://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-bp/#coverages as proposed by Peter and objected by Stephan.
  • The plan for next week is to organize the remaining issues on the GitHub project

Actions

  • All: Review and comment on issues

Recording

GoToMeeting

OGC TC meeting in Toulouse on 20191120

Agenda

Attendees

see https://portal.opengeospatial.org/?m=projects&a=view&project_id=263&tab=7

Motion

Actions

  • All: Review and contribute issues and requirements

Recording

GoToMeeting

OGC TC meeting in Banff on 20190909

Agenda

Attendees

see https://portal.opengeospatial.org/?m=projects&a=view&project_id=263&tab=7

Actions

  • All: Review and contribute issues and requirements

Recording

GoToMeeting

Teleconference 20190612

Agenda

Attendees

Chuck, Eugene, James, Joan, Stephan

Minutes

  • Discussion about using SwaggerHub like for Map Tiles -> recommendation from API Common (cf. section 6)
  • Fabian from EOX has started for coverages at https://app.swaggerhub.com/apis/constantinius/ogc-api-coverages/1.0.0
  • Stephan informs that there are resources reserved on the Azure cloud provided by ordnance survey for the WCS SWG
  • Agreed to leave teleconference next week scheduled in case it is needed but likely it will be canceled as most of us will be traveling

Actions

  • Chuck: Build GitHub project following the example of API Common
  • Stephan: Add tags to GitHub issues (e.g. Hackathon) and organize in the project built by Chuck following the example of API Common
  • Stephan: Prepare slides about open points for discussion with API Common at the hackathon
  • All: Prepare and get ready for the hackathon next week

Recording

GoToMeeting

Teleconference 20190529

Agenda

Attendees

Amy, Chris, Chuck, Eugene, Gobe, Stephan

Minutes

  • How do we define success for the Hackathon? The groups common understanding of the main objectives is to get consensus that OpenAPI is the right way to go for the next generation of OGC standards and to factor out commonalities in OGC API Common which all groups agree to use.
  • Gobe: Key points are
    • OpenAPI
    • in line with WFS 3
    • make specs consistent
    • Hackathon focus on testable and implementable
  • Chuck: Regarding scope, currently OpenAPI is the only definition language we're using but there might be others in future
  • Gobe: The agenda does not focus on Common, it has both splitting into teams (resource specific) as well as common
    • boundary between common and resource specific
    • what should be optional in common
  • Chuck: common defines mechanisms that can be used if needed but don't have to be used
  • Additionally the idea was brought forward to have a break-out session to harmonize by looking at overlaps and commonalities between building blocks, i.e., coverages, features, and common.
    • The agenda is flexible and up to the SWG chairs to coordinate and organize ad-hoc sessions
    • 2 times 10 people in board room; event space 50 people sitting at desks; social space/kitchen with probably 4 tables
      • possible configurations
        • 10, 10, 25, 25
        • 10, 10, 50
        • 20, 25, 25
  • Gobe: Please fill in form if you need space on provided infrastructure https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1HH_Lbnx797yGWWn5xBcCrVF0sWbcqbsn5fsYtYwGsO8

Actions

  • Stephan: Fill in form for resources on behalf of the WCS SWG
  • All: Review and contribute issues and requirements

Recording

GoToMeeting

Teleconference 20190522

Agenda

Attendees

Amy, Chris, Michael, Eugene, Paul, Peter, Stephan

Minutes

  • Chris informs that the Met-Office is going to be at the hackathon and will provide/bring multidimensional data and service
  • Known participants are
    • Met-Office
    • National Weather Service
    • Ordnance survey
    • OpenEO
    • Sinergise
    • Jacobs University/rasdaman
    • EOX
  • There is space for a maximum of 70 participants and twice as much are on the waiting list
  • Chris raises the question how success is defined for the hackathon.
    • Michael emphasized to define a mission like Chris Holmes did for WFS and STAC.

    • Chris: Indication if WFS 3 is going the right direction. Build suite of APIs that are consistent. Met-Ocean hackathon in December in Washington based on WFS. Coverages are only for GeoSpatial experts.

    • Stephan: This is a first hackathon in a series with focus on Common. Personal objective to make it way easier for client implementers.

    • Chris: UK Gov OpenAPI initiative API guidance is that they all should be based on OpenAPI 3.0 - https://github.com/alphagov/open-standards/issues/31#issuecomment-493437352

    • The groups common understanding of the main objectives is to get consensus that OpenAPI is the right way to go for the next generation of OGC standards and to factor out commonalities in OGC API Common which all groups agree to use.

  • Michael introduces his view on OGC Next Generation APIs. He will put the diagram on GitHub.
  • Peter suggests a break-out session to harmonize by looking at overlap, commonalities between building blocks, i.e., coverages, features, and common.

Actions

  • Stephan: Send mail to Gobe to ask about objectives and invite to next week's meeting
  • Michael: Put shown diagram on GitHub
  • All: Review and contribute issues and requirements

Recording

GoToMeeting

Teleconference 20190508

Agenda

Attendees

Chuck, Eugene, Jürgen, Peter, Stephan S.

Minutes

  • We only had a brief general discussion mainly about API Common and usage of IDs

Actions

  • Chuck: Check definition for IDs #19. Do we break OpenAPI when using IRIs as defined in RFC3987?
  • All: Review and contribute issues and requirements

Recording

GoToMeeting

Teleconference 20190503

Agenda

Attendees

Chuck, Eugene, Joan, Peter, Stephan S., Stephan M.

Minutes

  • Weekly meeting time slot moved to Wednesday 10am EDT / 4pm CEST
  • Stephan introduces new wiki page capturing minutes
  • We reviewed some issues and try to close them
    • #20 - Agreed on steps to resolve
    • #19 - Deferred to API Common
    • #18 - Closed as part of #20
    • #17 - Might be inherited from API Common
    • #16 - Agreed to support both methods (bbox, subset) in filtering on collection level but only use subset mechanism on coverage level

Actions

  • All: Review and contribute issues and requirements

Recording

GoToMeeting

Teleconference 20190426

Agenda

Attendees

Amy, Chuck, Eugene, Paul, Peter, Stephan

Minutes

  • Chuck presents changes made to the GitHub repository
    • got rid of distracting stuff, e.g. removed OAPI-Common directory
    • requirements directory
      • is the only normative part
      • they are included in clause 7
    • examples directory
      • are important to see how the requirements are actually implemented
      • again included in clause 7
    • for the hackathon clause 7 is the most important one
    • anything not specific to coverages should probably be in common
      • don't waste time on it
      • tie back to common via requirements class
    • everything needed for functional complete implementation should go in core, everything else in extensions
    • pattern for extensions
      • top level directory for each along OAPI-Coverages
    • naming convention will be in mail from Clemens soon, following ISO nomenclature
    • focus on getting requirements written
  • Stephan introduces new wiki page capturing decisions
  • We review some issues and try to close them

Actions

  • Chuck: Write some notes about structure and next steps up in the wiki
  • All: Review and contribute issues and requirements

Recording

GoToMeeting

Clone this wiki locally