Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8272472: StackGuardPages test doesn't build with glibc 2.34 #37

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

jankratochvil
Copy link
Contributor

@jankratochvil jankratochvil commented Dec 1, 2022

8272472: StackGuardPages test doesn't build with glibc 2.34

../test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/StackGuardPages/exeinvoke.c: In function 'set_signal_handler':
../test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/StackGuardPages/exeinvoke.c:72:15: error: storage size of 'altstack' isn't constant
   72 |   static char altstack[SIGSTKSZ];
      |               ^~~~~~~~

Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace

Issue

  • JDK-8272472: StackGuardPages test doesn't build with glibc 2.34

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/crac pull/37/head:pull/37
$ git checkout pull/37

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/37
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/crac pull/37/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 37

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 37

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/crac/pull/37.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 1, 2022

👋 Welcome back jankratochvil! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into crac will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport f77a1a156f3da9068d012d9227c7ee0fee58f571 8272472: StackGuardPages test doesn't build with glibc 2.34 Dec 1, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 1, 2022

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 1, 2022

⚠️ @jankratochvil the full name on your profile does not match the author name in this pull requests' HEAD commit. If this pull request gets integrated then the author name from this pull requests' HEAD commit will be used for the resulting commit. If you wish to push a new commit with a different author name, then please run the following commands in a local repository of your personal fork:

$ git checkout altstack
$ git commit --author='Preferred Full Name <you@example.com>' --allow-empty -m 'Update full name'
$ git push

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 1, 2022

@jankratochvil This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8272472: StackGuardPages test doesn't build with glibc 2.34

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the crac branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 1, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 1, 2022

Webrevs

@AntonKozlov
Copy link
Member

I'm not sure about this. The change was made for 18 and backported to JDK17.0.2. Instead of this, I'd prefer to continue CRaC development on JDK17u [1] or on openjdk/jdk master, to avoid backporting changes useful in general. Maintaining both will create some overhead though.

[1] https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/crac-dev/2022-May/000230.html

@jankratochvil jankratochvil mentioned this pull request Jan 9, 2023
1 task
@rvansa
Copy link
Collaborator

rvansa commented Feb 2, 2023

@AntonKozlov So what's the plan to get CRaC builiding with new glibc? Should I create a PR to merge in the most recent jdk17u-dev?

jankratochvil pushed a commit to jankratochvil/crac that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review
3 participants