8293065: Zero build failure on AArch64 and RISCV64 after JDK-8293007

[feilongjiang]

JDK-8293007 changes the AARCH64_PORT_ONLY macro into AARCH64, which is not an equivalent replacement.
This patch also fixes the same zero build failure on RISCV64.

Testing:

• Linux AArch64 zero release build
• Linux AArch64 server release build
• Linux RISCV64 zero release build
• Linux RISCV64 server release build

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8293065: Zero build failure on AArch64 and RISCV64 after JDK-8293007

Reviewers

• Erik Österlund (@fisk - Reviewer)
• Fei Yang (@RealFYang - Reviewer)
• Yadong Wang (@yadongw - Author)
• Vladimir Kozlov (@vnkozlov - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10075/head:pull/10075
$ git checkout pull/10075

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10075
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10075/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10075

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10075

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10075.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back fjiang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@feilongjiang The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (d9d151d6)

[fisk]

Looks good.

[openjdk]

@feilongjiang This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8293065: Zero build failure on AArch64 and RISCV64 after JDK-8293007

Reviewed-by: eosterlund, fyang, yadongwang, kvn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 20 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• c3380c0: 8292995: improve the SA page cache
• 1cf245d: 8292590: Product JVM crashes with FLAG_SET_XXX on non-product Flag
• 6335150: 6205692: (spec) javax.crypto.MacSpi.engineUpdate(ByteBuffer input): NPE should be specified
• 622be79: 8293090: Remove unused par_oop_since_save_marks_iterate_done
• 3d0ab2b: 8292858: G1: Remove redundant check in G1FlushHumongousCandidateRemSets
• 6e24827: 8292878: x86: Make scratch register usage explicit in assembler code
• f5ebbf3: 8292657: Calling GetLocalXXX from virtual thread with thread parameter set to NULL returns carrier locals
• 550e5d7: 4958071: (spec) confusing exception list for javax.crypto.Cipher.init(...) for
• d3d2e66: 8293009: Remove unused field 'millisPerHour' in DateFormatSymbols
• f3ebb42: 8293036: x86_64: Move Continuation-related stub methods to MacroAssembler
• ... and 10 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/e016363b54f1624e9ff4470803c6000d8fe91a7f...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@fisk, @RealFYang, @vnkozlov) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[RealFYang]

Looks fine to me.

[yadongw]

lgtm(not a reviewer)

[feilongjiang]

@fisk @RealFYang @yadongw @vnkozlov -- Thanks!
/integrate

[openjdk]

@feilongjiang
Your change (at version d9d151d) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[RealFYang]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 2d7792c.
Since your change was applied there have been 20 commits pushed to the master branch:

• c3380c0: 8292995: improve the SA page cache
• 1cf245d: 8292590: Product JVM crashes with FLAG_SET_XXX on non-product Flag
• 6335150: 6205692: (spec) javax.crypto.MacSpi.engineUpdate(ByteBuffer input): NPE should be specified
• 622be79: 8293090: Remove unused par_oop_since_save_marks_iterate_done
• 3d0ab2b: 8292858: G1: Remove redundant check in G1FlushHumongousCandidateRemSets
• 6e24827: 8292878: x86: Make scratch register usage explicit in assembler code
• f5ebbf3: 8292657: Calling GetLocalXXX from virtual thread with thread parameter set to NULL returns carrier locals
• 550e5d7: 4958071: (spec) confusing exception list for javax.crypto.Cipher.init(...) for
• d3d2e66: 8293009: Remove unused field 'millisPerHour' in DateFormatSymbols
• f3ebb42: 8293036: x86_64: Move Continuation-related stub methods to MacroAssembler
• ... and 10 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/e016363b54f1624e9ff4470803c6000d8fe91a7f...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@RealFYang @feilongjiang Pushed as commit 2d7792c.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.