8295774: Write a test to verify List sends ItemEvent/ActionEvent

[ravigupta30]

This testcase verify that List Item selection via mouse/keys generates ItemEvent/ActionEvent appropriately.

a. Single click on the list generate ItemEvent and double click on item generates ActionEvent.
b. UP/DOWN keys on the list generate ItemEvent and enter key on item generates ActionEvent.

Testing:
Tested using Mach5(20 times per platform) in macos,linux and windows and got all pass.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8295774: Write a test to verify List sends ItemEvent/ActionEvent

Reviewers

• Sergey Bylokhov (@mrserb - Reviewer) ⚠️ Review applies to c4cf5168
• Alexey Ivanov (@aivanov-jdk - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10899/head:pull/10899
$ git checkout pull/10899

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10899
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10899/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10899

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10899

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10899.diff

[bridgekeeper]

Hi @ravigupta30, welcome to this OpenJDK project and thanks for contributing!

We do not recognize you as Contributor and need to ensure you have signed the Oracle Contributor Agreement (OCA). If you have not signed the OCA, please follow the instructions. Please fill in your GitHub username in the "Username" field of the application. Once you have signed the OCA, please let us know by writing /signed in a comment in this pull request.

If you already are an OpenJDK Author, Committer or Reviewer, please click here to open a new issue so that we can record that fact. Please use "Add GitHub user ravigupta30" as summary for the issue.

If you are contributing this work on behalf of your employer and your employer has signed the OCA, please let us know by writing /covered in a comment in this pull request.

[openjdk]

@ravigupta30 The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[ravigupta30]

/covered

[bridgekeeper]

Thank you! Please allow for a few business days to verify that your employer has signed the OCA. Also, please note that pull requests that are pending an OCA check will not usually be evaluated, so your patience is appreciated!

[ravigupta30]

/covered Oracle employee

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 04: Full - Incremental (305b0122)
• 03: Full - Incremental (814c3397)
• 02: Full - Incremental (69296bb4)
• 01: Full - Incremental (984ab23f)
• 00: Full (c4cf5168)

[openjdk]

⚠️ @ravigupta30 the full name on your profile does not match the author name in this pull requests' HEAD commit. If this pull request gets integrated then the author name from this pull requests' HEAD commit will be used for the resulting commit. If you wish to push a new commit with a different author name, then please run the following commands in a local repository of your personal fork:

$ git checkout 8295774
$ git commit --author='Preferred Full Name <you@example.com>' --allow-empty -m 'Update full name'
$ git push

[openjdk]

@ravigupta30 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8295774: Write a test to verify List sends ItemEvent/ActionEvent

Reviewed-by: serb, aivanov

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 51 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• d771abb: 8295970: Add vector api sanity tests in tier1
• 7a85441: 8232933: Javac inferred type does not conform to equality constraint
• 6ee8ccf: 8296168: x86: Add reasonable constraints between AVX and SSE
• 1950747: 8279913: obsolete ExtendedDTraceProbes
• 13b20e0: 8296262: Remove dead code from InstanceKlass::signature_name()
• fd60036: 8296188: Update style and header in JDWP Protocol spec and JVMTI spec
• c7b95a8: 8296163: [aarch64] Cleanup Pre/Post addressing mode classes
• f84b0ad: 8295670: Remove duplication in java/util/Formatter/Basic*.java
• a124d8e: 8296115: Allow for compiling the JDK with strict standards conformance
• 491d43c: 8289838: ZGC: OOM before clearing all SoftReferences
• ... and 41 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/4b89fce0831f990d4b6af5e6e208342f68aed614...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@mrserb, @aivanov-jdk) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[aivanov-jdk]

@ravigupta30, I edited the JBS subject, you have to update the subject of the PR here.

[ravigupta30]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@ravigupta30
Your change (at version 305b012) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[ravigupta30]

can someone sponsor.

[aivanov-jdk]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 2a79dfc.
Since your change was applied there have been 52 commits pushed to the master branch:

• cc3c5a1: 8296101: nmethod::is_unloading result unstable with concurrent unloading
• d771abb: 8295970: Add vector api sanity tests in tier1
• 7a85441: 8232933: Javac inferred type does not conform to equality constraint
• 6ee8ccf: 8296168: x86: Add reasonable constraints between AVX and SSE
• 1950747: 8279913: obsolete ExtendedDTraceProbes
• 13b20e0: 8296262: Remove dead code from InstanceKlass::signature_name()
• fd60036: 8296188: Update style and header in JDWP Protocol spec and JVMTI spec
• c7b95a8: 8296163: [aarch64] Cleanup Pre/Post addressing mode classes
• f84b0ad: 8295670: Remove duplication in java/util/Formatter/Basic*.java
• a124d8e: 8296115: Allow for compiling the JDK with strict standards conformance
• ... and 42 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/4b89fce0831f990d4b6af5e6e208342f68aed614...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@aivanov-jdk @ravigupta30 Pushed as commit 2a79dfc.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

[mlbridge]

Mailing list message from Patrick Chen on client-libs-dev:

agree

Le mer. 2 nov. 2022 ? 16:10, Alexey Ivanov <aivanov at openjdk.org> a ?crit :

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/client-libs-dev/attachments/20221102/2291a7ca/attachment.htm>