-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8278411: Implement UseHeavyMonitors consistently, s390 port #13978
8278411: Implement UseHeavyMonitors consistently, s390 port #13978
Conversation
👋 Welcome back amitkumar! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@offamitkumar The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
/label remove core-libs, hotspot /label add hotspot-compiler, hotspot-runtime |
@offamitkumar The |
@offamitkumar The |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please check my findings.
z_bre(done); | ||
} else { | ||
// Set NE to indicate 'failure' -> take slow-path | ||
z_ltgr(oop, oop); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think z_bru(done);
is missing, here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please check updated version.
z_bru(done); // Csg sets CR as desired. | ||
} else { | ||
// Set NE to indicate 'failure' -> take slow-path | ||
z_ltgr(oop, oop); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same, here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@offamitkumar This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 23 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@TheRealMDoerr, @tstuefe, @RealLucy) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Thank you @RealLucy for reviewing it. @TheRealMDoerr would you like to take another look before we proceed with integration 🙂 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the update!
Thanks for reviews, /integrate |
@offamitkumar |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit 41ee125.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@TheRealMDoerr @offamitkumar Pushed as commit 41ee125. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This PR make s390x to adapt the changes done in JDK-8276901 OR implements UseHeavyMonitors.
JDK-8291555 still needs Porting effort. As for
LM_LIGHTWEIGHT
locking mode, code is Unimplemented.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13978/head:pull/13978
$ git checkout pull/13978
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13978
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13978/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13978
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13978
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13978.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment