-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8330806: test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/c1/TestLargeMonitorOffset.java fails on ARM32 #18891
Conversation
👋 Welcome back avoitylov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@voitylov This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 981 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@dsamersoff) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
__ ldr(R1, Address(OSR_buf, slot_offset + 0*BytesPerWord)); | ||
__ ldr(R2, Address(OSR_buf, slot_offset + 1*BytesPerWord)); | ||
if (slot_offset >= 4096 - BytesPerWord) { | ||
__ add_slow(R2, OSR_buf, slot_offset); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can't we check this once before the loop? Or does such an optimization make no sense?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Sergey. Thanks for looking at this.
This is not performance critical code, and the typical number_of_locks value is 0, so IF inside the FOR loop makes sense here.
I've checked the patch (one may need to use a workaround ). The JDK crashes without the patch, and passes with the patch. |
@voitylov This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me
Looks good |
/integrate |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit 0e0dfca.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@dsamersoff @voitylov Pushed as commit 0e0dfca. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
TestLargeMonitorOffset was introduced by 8310844 with a fix for the AArch64 platform. The same issue needs to be fixed for ARM32. With this change, we add the large slot_offset handling to the ARM32 version of IR_Assembler::osr_entry().
Testing: jtreg hotspot, jtreg jdk tier1-3.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18891/head:pull/18891
$ git checkout pull/18891
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/18891
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18891/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 18891
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 18891
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18891.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment