Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8261660: AArch64: Race condition in stub code generation for LSE Atomics #2553

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

theRealAph
Copy link
Contributor

@theRealAph theRealAph commented Feb 12, 2021

Temporary fix for race condition.

There's a narrow race condition in the code which generates LSE Atomic stubs and enables them for use by the runtime. DIsable LSE stub generation for now.

/cc hotspot


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8261660: AArch64: Race condition in stub code generation for LSE Atomics

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/2553/head:pull/2553
$ git checkout pull/2553

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 12, 2021

👋 Welcome back aph! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added rfr Pull request is ready for review hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org labels Feb 12, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 12, 2021

@theRealAph
The hotspot label was successfully added.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 12, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@dcubed-ojdk dcubed-ojdk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks okay, but I have to wonder if the rest of the template changes
in src/hotspot/os_cpu/linux_aarch64/atomic_linux_aarch64.hpp
that were made by https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8261027
also need to be backed out? Please clarify.

Copy link
Contributor

@adinn adinn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this will be fine for now until the code generation and update of the code pointers can be corrected to happen in the right order.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 12, 2021

@theRealAph This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8261660: AArch64: Race condition in stub code generation for LSE Atomics

Reviewed-by: dcubed, adinn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 6675775: 8253702: BigSur version number reported as 10.16, should be 11.nn
  • 33fcd32: 8261659: JDK-8261027 causes a Tier1 validate-source failure
  • 3aa1b4c: 8261623: reference to javac internals in Extern class

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 12, 2021
Copy link
Member

@dcubed-ojdk dcubed-ojdk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the explanation. Thumbs up.

This is a trivial fix and does not have to wait for 24 hours.

@adinn
Copy link
Contributor

adinn commented Feb 12, 2021

@dcubed-ojdk A complete fix merely requires writing the generated stub code before updating the stub function pointers. With this change all that happens is that those pointers continue pointing to the default routines. There is no point backing out the rest of the code given that it will almost all be needed.

@theRealAph
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 12, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 12, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 12, 2021

@theRealAph Since your change was applied there have been 4 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 28163a9: 8261652: Remove some dead comments from os_bsd_x86
  • 6675775: 8253702: BigSur version number reported as 10.16, should be 11.nn
  • 33fcd32: 8261659: JDK-8261027 causes a Tier1 validate-source failure
  • 3aa1b4c: 8261623: reference to javac internals in Extern class

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit a305743.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants