Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8264279: Shenandoah: Missing handshake after JDK-8263427 #3248

Closed

Conversation

zhengyu123
Copy link
Contributor

@zhengyu123 zhengyu123 commented Mar 29, 2021

JDK-8263427 mistakenly removed handshake after concurrent weak roots, which is needed to flush out stale oops before we can safely recycle trash regions. Otherwise, those stale oops are suddenly resurrected, because they are above TAMS after regions are recycled.

Test:

  • hotspot_gc_shenandoah

Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8264279: Shenandoah: Missing handshake after JDK-8263427

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3248/head:pull/3248
$ git checkout pull/3248

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3248
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3248/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3248

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3248

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3248.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 29, 2021

👋 Welcome back zgu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 29, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 29, 2021

@zhengyu123 The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc
  • shenandoah

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org labels Mar 29, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 29, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

D'oh. Looks good.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 30, 2021

@zhengyu123 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8264279: Shenandoah: Missing handshake after JDK-8263427

Reviewed-by: shade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 8 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 1a681fa: 8263560: Remove needless wrapping with BufferedInputStream
  • 182b11c: 8264016: [JVMCI] add some thread local fields for use by JVMCI
  • 8cf1c62: 8263754: HexFormat 'fromHex' methods should be static
  • a5d7de2: 8263404: RsaPrivateKeySpec is always recognized as RSAPrivateCrtKeySpec in RSAKeyFactory.engineGetKeySpec
  • 128c0c9: 8248418: jpackage fails to extract main class and version from app module linked in external runtime
  • fd45694: 8264344: Outdated links in JavaComponentAccessibility.m
  • f17ea9e: 8262899: TestRedirectLinks fails
  • 963f1fc: 8264309: JFR: Improve .jfc parser

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 30, 2021
@zhengyu123
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 30, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 30, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 30, 2021

@zhengyu123 Since your change was applied there have been 16 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • ac604a1: 8264374: Shenandoah: Remove leftover parallel reference processing argument
  • f3726a8: 8264020: Optimize double negation elimination
  • 4ffa41c: 8263615: Cleanup tightly_coupled_allocation
  • 4ea6abf: 8264324: Simplify allocation list management in OopStorage::reduce_deferred_updates
  • 8735259: 8264333: Use the blessed modifier order in jdk.jshell
  • d2a63f2: 8264360: Loop strip mining verification fails with "should be on the backedge"
  • 8100a20: 8263971: C2 crashes with SIGFPE with -XX:+StressGCM and -XX:+StressIGVN
  • bcdf469: 8264337: VM crashed when -XX:+VerifySharedSpaces
  • 1a681fa: 8263560: Remove needless wrapping with BufferedInputStream
  • 182b11c: 8264016: [JVMCI] add some thread local fields for use by JVMCI
  • ... and 6 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/364cce1485aad9a870fefda38017301e481a31d9...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit ee5e00b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@zhengyu123 zhengyu123 deleted the JDK-8264279-missing-handshake branch July 19, 2022 18:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org
2 participants