-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8260621: (jrtfs) ThreadLocal memory leak in ImageBufferCache when using jrtfs #3849
Conversation
👋 Welcome back sundar! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@sundararajana The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
@sundararajana This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 23 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks OK to me.
/integrate |
@sundararajana Since your change was applied there have been 37 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit c9873c4. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
new ThreadLocal<BufferReference[]>() { | ||
|
||
/* | ||
* We used to have a class BufferReference extending from WeakReference<ByteBuffer>. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this comment needs to be re-worded to drop "We used to have ...", "Solution is ..." and the other history. Instead it should provide a clear paragraph that explains the value of the TL for anyone reading this code.
Instead of BufferReference class, Map.Entry is used as pair implementation.
This avoids the metaspace leak seen via thread local.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3849/head:pull/3849
$ git checkout pull/3849
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3849
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3849/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3849
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3849
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3849.diff