Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8260621: (jrtfs) ThreadLocal memory leak in ImageBufferCache when using jrtfs #3849

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

sundararajana
Copy link
Member

@sundararajana sundararajana commented May 4, 2021

Instead of BufferReference class, Map.Entry is used as pair implementation.
This avoids the metaspace leak seen via thread local.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8260621: (jrtfs) ThreadLocal memory leak in ImageBufferCache when using jrtfs

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3849/head:pull/3849
$ git checkout pull/3849

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3849
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/3849/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3849

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3849

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3849.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 4, 2021

👋 Welcome back sundar! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 4, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 4, 2021

@sundararajana The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label May 4, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 4, 2021

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 4, 2021

@sundararajana This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8260621: (jrtfs) ThreadLocal memory leak in ImageBufferCache when using jrtfs

Reviewed-by: jlaskey, vtewari

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 23 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 770dfc1: 8265279: Remove unused RandomGeneratorFactory.all(Class category)
  • ee5bba0: 8265767: compiler/eliminateAutobox/TestIntBoxing.java crashes on arm32 after 8264649 in debug VMs
  • 05e6017: 8265137: java.util.Random suddenly has new public methods nowhere documented
  • aa90df6: 8266187: Memory leak in appendBootClassPath()
  • b651904: 8266438: Compile::remove_useless_nodes does not remove opaque nodes
  • 141cc2f: 8261527: Record page size used for underlying mapping in ReservedSpace
  • 8e071c4: 8265784: [C2] Hoisting of DecodeN leaves MachTemp inputs behind
  • ce1bc9d: 8266432: ZGC: GC allocation stalls can trigger deadlocks
  • 30ccd80: 8264950: Set opaque for JTooltip in config file of NimbusLookAndFeel
  • cfdf4a7: 8266449: cleanup jtreg tags in compiler/intrinsics/sha/cli tests
  • ... and 13 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/c5dc657f0be90bd594663dcc612f40a930c2bbe7...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 4, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@vyommani vyommani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks OK to me.

@sundararajana
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 5, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 5, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 5, 2021

@sundararajana Since your change was applied there have been 37 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 82768d9: 8221503: vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/eval/eval001/eval001.java fails with: com.sun.jdi.InvalidTypeException: Can't assign double[][][] to double[][][]
  • b71f85a: 8264398: BevelBorderUIResource​(int, Color, Color) and BevelBoder(int, Color, Color) spec should clarify about usage of highlight and shadow color
  • b172555: 8266171: -Warray-bounds happens in imageioJPEG.c
  • 8bcebe7: 8265505: findsym does not work on remote debug server
  • b88785d: 8266038: Move newAddress() to JVMDebugger
  • 2c53654: 8266179: [macos] jpackage should specify architecture for produced pkg files
  • d282799: 8255566: Add size validation when parsing values from VersionProps
  • 61365d5: 8266465: Add wildcard to JTwork/JTreport exclude in jib-profiles.js
  • f00b70e: 8266527: RandomTestCoverage.java failing due to API removal
  • c53dee7: 8266227: Fix help text for --mac-signing-keychain
  • ... and 27 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/c5dc657f0be90bd594663dcc612f40a930c2bbe7...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit c9873c4.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

new ThreadLocal<BufferReference[]>() {

/*
* We used to have a class BufferReference extending from WeakReference<ByteBuffer>.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this comment needs to be re-worded to drop "We used to have ...", "Solution is ..." and the other history. Instead it should provide a clear paragraph that explains the value of the TL for anyone reading this code.

@sundararajana sundararajana deleted the JDK-8260621 branch May 5, 2021 10:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
4 participants