Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8277777: [Vector API] assert(r->is_XMMRegister()) failed: must be in x86_32.ad #6535

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

DamonFool
Copy link
Member

@DamonFool DamonFool commented Nov 24, 2021

Hi all,

The following vector api tests fail on x86_32/AVX512 with assert(r->is_XMMRegister()) failed: must be.

jdk/incubator/vector/Byte64VectorLoadStoreTests.java
jdk/incubator/vector/Byte256VectorLoadStoreTests.java
jdk/incubator/vector/Byte128VectorLoadStoreTests.java
jdk/incubator/vector/ByteMaxVectorLoadStoreTests.java
jdk/incubator/vector/Double256VectorTests.java
jdk/incubator/vector/Double512VectorTests.java
jdk/incubator/vector/DoubleMaxVectorTests.java       
jdk/incubator/vector/Float512VectorTests.java           
jdk/incubator/vector/Float256VectorTests.java
jdk/incubator/vector/FloatMaxVectorTests.java
jdk/incubator/vector/Float128VectorTests.java
jdk/incubator/vector/Short128VectorLoadStoreTests.java
jdk/incubator/vector/Short256VectorLoadStoreTests.java
jdk/incubator/vector/Short64VectorLoadStoreTests.java
jdk/incubator/vector/ShortMaxVectorLoadStoreTests.java

The reason is that static enum RC rc_class( OptoReg::Name reg ) [1] missed the case for KRegister.
And the AVX-512 opmask specific spilling code [2] should be located before the size assert [3].

Thanks.
Best regards,
Jie

[1] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/hotspot/cpu/x86/x86_32.ad#L747
[2] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/hotspot/cpu/x86/x86_32.ad#L1272
[3] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/hotspot/cpu/x86/x86_32.ad#L1252


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8277777: [Vector API] assert(r->is_XMMRegister()) failed: must be in x86_32.ad

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6535/head:pull/6535
$ git checkout pull/6535

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/6535
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6535/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 6535

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 6535

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6535.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 24, 2021

👋 Welcome back jiefu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 24, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 24, 2021

@DamonFool The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 24, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 24, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That looks good to me but @jatin-bhateja should have a look as well.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 29, 2021

@DamonFool This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8277777: [Vector API] assert(r->is_XMMRegister()) failed: must be in x86_32.ad

Reviewed-by: thartmann, jbhateja

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 70 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c733193: 8262297: ImageIO.write() method will throw IndexOutOfBoundsException
  • da2be99: 8277026: Remove blank lines remaining from snippet markup
  • 0a01baa: 8277986: Typo in javadoc of java.util.zip.ZipEntry#setTime
  • 7049c13: 8231107: Allow store password to be null when saving a PKCS12 KeyStore
  • ab867f6: 8272162: S4U2Self ticket without forwardable flag
  • dd73e3c: 8277814: ConcurrentRefineThread should report rate when deactivating
  • 65251f7: 8151594: Move concurrent refinement thread activation logging out of GC pause
  • f1c20e9: 8190748: java/text/Format/DateFormat/DateFormatTest.java and NonGregorianFormatTest fail intermittently
  • 2942646: 8276683: Malformed Javadoc inline tags in JDK source in com/sun/tools/javac/util/RawDiagnosticFormatter.java
  • e30e676: 8277606: String(String) constructor could copy hashIsZero
  • ... and 60 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/96e36071b63b624d56739b014b457ffc48147c4f...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 29, 2021
@DamonFool
Copy link
Member Author

That looks good to me but @jatin-bhateja should have a look as well.

Thanks @TobiHartmann .

@jatin-bhateja, please kindly review it.
Thanks.

@@ -755,6 +755,7 @@ static enum RC rc_class( OptoReg::Name reg ) {
assert(UseSSE < 2, "shouldn't be used in SSE2+ mode");
return rc_float;
}
if (r->is_KRegister()) return rc_kreg;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks , this looks ok to me.

Comment on lines +1290 to +1309
assert( size > 0, "missed a case" );

// --------------------------------------------------------------------
// Check for second bits still needing moving.
if( src_second == dst_second )
return size; // Self copy; no move
assert( src_second_rc != rc_bad && dst_second_rc != rc_bad, "src_second & dst_second cannot be Bad" );

// Check for second word int-int move
if( src_second_rc == rc_int && dst_second_rc == rc_int )
return impl_mov_helper(cbuf,do_size,src_second,dst_second,size, st);

// Check for second word integer store
if( src_second_rc == rc_int && dst_second_rc == rc_stack )
return impl_helper(cbuf,do_size,false,ra_->reg2offset(dst_second),src_second,0x89,"MOV ",size, st);

// Check for second word integer load
if( dst_second_rc == rc_int && src_second_rc == rc_stack )
return impl_helper(cbuf,do_size,true ,ra_->reg2offset(src_second),dst_second,0x8B,"MOV ",size, st);

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change looks unrelated to opmask spilling.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @jatin-bhateja for your review.

Actually, the part of change just moves the AVX-512 opmask specific spilling code [1] before the size assert [2].

[1] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/hotspot/cpu/x86/x86_32.ad#L1272
[2] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/hotspot/cpu/x86/x86_32.ad#L1252

@DamonFool
Copy link
Member Author

The build failure of Windows x64 has nothing to do with this change.
So integrate it.
Thanks.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 1, 2021

Going to push as commit 349328c.
Since your change was applied there have been 70 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c733193: 8262297: ImageIO.write() method will throw IndexOutOfBoundsException
  • da2be99: 8277026: Remove blank lines remaining from snippet markup
  • 0a01baa: 8277986: Typo in javadoc of java.util.zip.ZipEntry#setTime
  • 7049c13: 8231107: Allow store password to be null when saving a PKCS12 KeyStore
  • ab867f6: 8272162: S4U2Self ticket without forwardable flag
  • dd73e3c: 8277814: ConcurrentRefineThread should report rate when deactivating
  • 65251f7: 8151594: Move concurrent refinement thread activation logging out of GC pause
  • f1c20e9: 8190748: java/text/Format/DateFormat/DateFormatTest.java and NonGregorianFormatTest fail intermittently
  • 2942646: 8276683: Malformed Javadoc inline tags in JDK source in com/sun/tools/javac/util/RawDiagnosticFormatter.java
  • e30e676: 8277606: String(String) constructor could copy hashIsZero
  • ... and 60 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/96e36071b63b624d56739b014b457ffc48147c4f...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 1, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 1, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 1, 2021

@DamonFool Pushed as commit 349328c.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@DamonFool DamonFool deleted the JDK-8277777 branch December 1, 2021 07:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants