Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8284023: java.sun.awt.X11GraphicsDevice.getDoubleBufferVisuals() leaks XdbeScreenVisualInfo #8047

Conversation

zhengyu123
Copy link
Contributor

@zhengyu123 zhengyu123 commented Mar 30, 2022

Please review this small patch that fixes memory leak of XdbeScreenVisualInfo obtained from XdbeGetVisualInfo() method call.

Test:

  • jdk_awt

Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8284023: java.sun.awt.X11GraphicsDevice.getDoubleBufferVisuals() leaks XdbeScreenVisualInfo

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/8047/head:pull/8047
$ git checkout pull/8047

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/8047
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/8047/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 8047

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 8047

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8047.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 30, 2022

👋 Welcome back zgu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Mar 30, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 30, 2022

@zhengyu123 The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Mar 30, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 30, 2022

Webrevs

@@ -1428,6 +1428,7 @@ Java_sun_awt_X11GraphicsDevice_getDoubleBufferVisuals(JNIEnv *env,
break;
}
}
XdbeFreeVisualInfo(visScreenInfo);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should use AWT_UNLOCK/AWT_UNLOCK here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed. I assume all X11 calls have to be serialized, right?

Thanks.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you mean "and so there's no chance of a deadlock", well no .. but here we only have the one lock in this JNI method and we are using the lock already earlier so it is relatively safe.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review, @prrace

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mrserb Is it okay now?

Thanks

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 4, 2022

@zhengyu123 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8284023: java.sun.awt.X11GraphicsDevice.getDoubleBufferVisuals() leaks XdbeScreenVisualInfo

Reviewed-by: prr, serb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 79 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 4, 2022
@zhengyu123
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @mrserb

@zhengyu123
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 6, 2022

Going to push as commit ec205f6.
Since your change was applied there have been 87 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • b9cc3bc: 8284067: jpackage'd launcher reports non-zero exit codes with error prompt
  • bbe894f: 8284288: Use SVG images for FocusSpec.html and Modality.html
  • e524107: 8280872: Reorder code cache segments to improve code density
  • e18414a: 8284014: Menu items with submenus in JPopupMEnu are not spoken on macOS
  • b56df28: 8283935: Parallel: Crash during pretouch after large pages allocation failure
  • 0a67d68: 8284294: Create an automated regression test for RFE 4138746
  • 955d61d: 8284369: TestFailedAllocationBadGraph fails with -XX:TieredStopAtLevel < 4
  • 4ffe96a: 8282506: Clean up remaining references to TwoStacksPlain*SocketImpl
  • 741be46: 8183390: Fix and re-enable post loop vectorization
  • 500f9a5: 8283396: Null pointer dereference in loopnode.cpp:2851
  • ... and 77 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/720e751f35150251cab05bc9fca3add39daf70af...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 6, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 6, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 6, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 6, 2022

@zhengyu123 Pushed as commit ec205f6.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants