-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8289801: [IR Framework] Add flags to whitelist which can be used to simulate a specific machine setup like UseAVX #9509
Conversation
…imulate a specific machine setup like UseAVX
👋 Welcome back jiefu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@DamonFool The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider adding IR tests to vector testing group which we (Oracle) run with different AVX,SSE settings:
test/hotspot/jtreg/TEST.groups
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ hotspot_containers_extended = \
hotspot_vector_1 = \
compiler/c2/cr6340864 \
+ compiler/c2/irTests \
compiler/codegen \
compiler/loopopts/superword \
compiler/vectorapi \
I submitted testing with this additional change.
compiler/c2/irTests/TestVectorizeURShiftSubword.java test failed. Details in RFE. |
IR tests had been added into vector testing. |
Thanks @vnkozlov for the review and testing. I can only reproduce the failure with |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me! Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me. I'll run testing and report back once it passed.
@DamonFool This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 18 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
All tests passed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good.
Thank you all for the review and testing. |
Going to push as commit 4a4d8ed.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@DamonFool Pushed as commit 4a4d8ed. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi all,
Please review this trivial change which adds
UseAVX, UseSSE and UseSVE
to the whitelist of IR test framework.Thanks.
Best regards,
Jie
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9509/head:pull/9509
$ git checkout pull/9509
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9509
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9509/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9509
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9509
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9509.diff