-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
7190978: javax/swing/JComponent/7154030/bug7154030.java fails on mac #955
Closed
Closed
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
62fbb21
Initial fix
prsadhuk f3f9f9f
7190978: javax/swing/JComponent/7154030/bug7154030.java fails on mac
prsadhuk b6a90f1
Remove uiScale
prsadhuk cf936ae
use getBounds()
prsadhuk 63209dd
Used window getbounds
prsadhuk f5fd716
Address review comment
prsadhuk File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The usage of size 300x300 has the same issues as locx/locy before. It is part of the window bounds.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
but 300x300 is set in frame setSize..if I use frame getBounds instead of already set 300x300, that will not be right, according to me...What if getBounds() has some bug (in some platform) and return some other width/height (say 1 pixel less, we might have similar bug in 8196465) that what is set in setSize, then the test might pass even though robot is capturing wrong bounds.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test should set the size 300,300 to the frame and then request and use the real bounds of the frame.
The getBounds() simply returns the size which was set by the native system, so is it a bug in getBounds() or the real bounds of the frame "say 1 pixel less"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any further feedback?