Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8318953: RISC-V: Small refactoring for MacroAssembler::test_bit #1941

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

zifeihan
Copy link
Member

@zifeihan zifeihan commented Nov 2, 2023

Hi, this backport to make the test_bit assember function more simpler and to improve performance when the parameter (1UL << bit_pos) exceeds 32-bit range. This is a risc-v specific change.
Backport is not clean. because the fastlock needs to call test_bit, in the mainline version, the fastlock function is renamed and moved to c2_MacroAssembler_riscv.cpp, but in jdk17u-dev, fastlock is still in riscv.ad.

Testing:

qemu 8.1.50:

  • Tier1 tests (release)

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8318953 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8318953: RISC-V: Small refactoring for MacroAssembler::test_bit (Enhancement - P4 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/1941/head:pull/1941
$ git checkout pull/1941

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1941
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/1941/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1941

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1941

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/1941.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 2, 2023

👋 Welcome back gcao! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 988e1dfe6ec9b5e77d2e8a78eb792a127c6fe907 8318953: RISC-V: Small refactoring for MacroAssembler::test_bit Nov 2, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 2, 2023

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport rfr Pull request is ready for review approval labels Nov 2, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 2, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@RealFYang RealFYang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 2, 2023

⚠️ @zifeihan This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 2, 2023

@zifeihan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8318953: RISC-V: Small refactoring for MacroAssembler::test_bit

Reviewed-by: fyang

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 594e5d7: 8312467: relax the builddir check in make/autoconf/basic.m4
  • 8922e52: 8312612: handle WideCharToMultiByte return values

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@RealFYang) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Nov 2, 2023
@zifeihan
Copy link
Member Author

zifeihan commented Nov 2, 2023

@RealFYang Thanks for your review.
/integrate

@RealFYang
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Nov 2, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 2, 2023

@zifeihan
Your change (at version 39e0a15) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 2, 2023

Going to push as commit 348a703.
Since your change was applied there have been 2 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 594e5d7: 8312467: relax the builddir check in make/autoconf/basic.m4
  • 8922e52: 8312612: handle WideCharToMultiByte return values

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 2, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 2, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Nov 2, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 2, 2023

@RealFYang @zifeihan Pushed as commit 348a703.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@zifeihan zifeihan deleted the backport-JDK-8318953 branch March 31, 2024 01:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants