Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8243543: jtreg test security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/BuypassCA.java fails #34

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor

@jerboaa jerboaa commented Mar 3, 2023

Simple test fix. Clean, test-only fix modulo path changes and ProblemList.txt changes. Add this so that https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8245654 can be added and tests pass.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8243543: jtreg test security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/BuypassCA.java fails

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u pull/34/head:pull/34
$ git checkout pull/34

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/34
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u pull/34/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 34

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 34

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u/pull/34.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 3, 2023

👋 Welcome back sgehwolf! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 45abbeed2f4f2899a3c1595b0cd8e573990a16fa 8243543: jtreg test security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/BuypassCA.java fails Mar 3, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 3, 2023

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 3, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 3, 2023

Webrevs

@jerboaa jerboaa mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2023
4 tasks
Copy link
Member

@phohensee phohensee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 3, 2023

@jerboaa This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8243543: jtreg test security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/BuypassCA.java fails

Reviewed-by: phh, andrew

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 3, 2023
@jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

jerboaa commented Mar 3, 2023

Thanks, Paul!

Copy link
Member

@gnu-andrew gnu-andrew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Backport looks good (though not clean as it doesn't include changes to ProblemList.txt, due to the absence of JDK-8263069)

I wouldn't usually approve this for a critical request on its own, but will do so as it's a pre-requisite for JDK-8245654

Do you know if we also need JDK-8263059, which fixes the third test excluded by 8263069?

@gnu-andrew
Copy link
Member

Do you know if we also need JDK-8263059, which fixes the third test excluded by 8263069?

It seems we do, so I'll open a regular 8u-dev PR for that one.

@jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

jerboaa commented Mar 3, 2023

Thanks!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 3, 2023

Going to push as commit 7c0d5b4.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Mar 3, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 3, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 3, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 3, 2023

@jerboaa Pushed as commit 7c0d5b4.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

jerboaa commented Mar 3, 2023

Do you know if we also need JDK-8263059, which fixes the third test excluded by 8263069?

ComodoCA.java passes for me with latest jdk8u master:

Passed: sun/security/lib/cacerts/VerifyCACerts.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/AmazonCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/BuypassCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/CertignaCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/ComodoCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/DTrustCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/EntrustCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/GlobalSignR6CA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/GoDaddyCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/HaricaCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LetsEncryptCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrustCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/QuoVadisCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/SSLCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/TeliaSoneraCA.java
Test results: passed: 15

@gnu-andrew
Copy link
Member

Do you know if we also need JDK-8263059, which fixes the third test excluded by 8263069?

ComodoCA.java passes for me with latest jdk8u master:

Passed: sun/security/lib/cacerts/VerifyCACerts.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/AmazonCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/BuypassCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/CertignaCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/ComodoCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/DTrustCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/EntrustCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/GlobalSignR6CA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/GoDaddyCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/HaricaCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LetsEncryptCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/LuxTrustCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/QuoVadisCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/SSLCA.java
Passed: security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/TeliaSoneraCA.java
Test results: passed: 15

Passes with as well. Strange. openjdk/jdk8u-dev#276 will at least sync the test with 11u.

@gnu-andrew
Copy link
Member

BTW, is there a reason these aren't in the GitHub Actions testing? It seems we could have caught these earlier if so and keeping this up-to-date seems important.

@jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

jerboaa commented Mar 8, 2023

BTW, is there a reason these aren't in the GitHub Actions testing? It seems we could have caught these earlier if so and keeping this up-to-date seems important.

I don't think there is. Feel free to propose a patch to rectify this! Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants