8296916: RISC-V: Move some small macro-assembler functions to header file

[DingliZhang]

Please review this backport to riscv-port-jdk17u.
Backport of JDK-8296916.
The original patch cannot be directly applied because jdk17u has no JDK-8294100 with MacroAssembler::object_move and has no vneg_v, either.

Testing:

Tier1-3 passed without new failure on unmacthed (release).

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8296916: RISC-V: Move some small macro-assembler functions to header file

Reviewers

• Fei Yang (@RealFYang - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/riscv-port-jdk17u.git pull/50/head:pull/50
$ git checkout pull/50

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/50
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/riscv-port-jdk17u.git pull/50/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 50

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 50

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/riscv-port-jdk17u/pull/50.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back dzhang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into riscv-port will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (a5e79b13)

[RealFYang]

Looks good. This change should be low risk and will help minimize difference with jdk mainline.

[openjdk]

@DingliZhang This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8296916: RISC-V: Move some small macro-assembler functions to header file

Reviewed-by: fyang

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the riscv-port branch:

• 0bdef91: 8308089: [riscv-port-jdk17u] Intrinsify Unsafe.storeStoreFence
• 3a02888: 8306667: RISC-V: Fix storeImmN0 matching rule by using zr register

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the riscv-port branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@RealFYang) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[DingliZhang]

Thanks for the review!
/integrate

[openjdk]

@DingliZhang
Your change (at version a5e79b1) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[RealFYang]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 9b88e8e.
Since your change was applied there have been 2 commits pushed to the riscv-port branch:

• 0bdef91: 8308089: [riscv-port-jdk17u] Intrinsify Unsafe.storeStoreFence
• 3a02888: 8306667: RISC-V: Fix storeImmN0 matching rule by using zr register

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@RealFYang @DingliZhang Pushed as commit 9b88e8e.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.