[PRE REVIEW]: The Data Behind Dark Matter: Exploring Galactic Rotation

[whedon]

Submitting author: @villaa (Anthony Villano)
Repository: https://github.com/villano-lab/galactic-spin-W1
Version: v3.0.0
Editor: @moorepants
Reviewers: @Carreau, @noelstoj
Managing EiC: Jordan Gorzalski

⚠️ JOSE reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSE is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/9fc3443a7c138ea1a3e1a15f4a3f14df"><img src="https://jose.theoj.org/papers/9fc3443a7c138ea1a3e1a15f4a3f14df/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/9fc3443a7c138ea1a3e1a15f4a3f14df/status.svg)](https://jose.theoj.org/papers/9fc3443a7c138ea1a3e1a15f4a3f14df)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @villaa. Currently, there isn't an JOSE editor assigned to your paper.

@villaa if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSE and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSE submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSE reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSE is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1184

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.08 s (664.3 files/s, 123207.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          13            463            596           1608
Jupyter Notebook                10              0           4263            839
TeX                              2             41              0            497
Markdown                        11            133              0            488
reStructuredText                 9            143            175            210
YAML                             5             10             22            102
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            52            802           5064           3779
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '9b614726eae1efae70c907ae' was
gathered on 2022/06/21.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Judit Bergfalk                  24          1421           4188           47.81
Kitty                           11           151             69            1.88
Kitty Harris                     2             5              5            0.09
Raphael Hatami                  12          5612            281           50.23

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Judit Bergfalk              972           68.4          4.7               18.83
Kitty                        84           55.6          3.6               39.29
Raphael Hatami             1611           28.7          0.0               23.59

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1086/182804 is OK
- 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06165.x is OK
- 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/157 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.5570790 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/203.3.735 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201116634 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12837.x is OK
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11532.x is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stv568 is OK
- 10.1086/318767 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201425339 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13422.x is OK
- 10.1086/505345 is OK
- 10.1086/527543 is OK
- DOI:10.5281/zenodo.6588350 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.5860/choice.35-2173 may be a valid DOI for title: An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements

INVALID DOIs

- None

[villaa]

Hi @jgorzalski ! Thanks for the instructions. I've consulted with my co-authors and the list and think that these reviewers may be appropriate:

Ali Ramadhan, Matthias Bussonnier, and Nathan Moore

Some of my co-authors git handles are listed here as I have encouraged them to track this thread and help the paper review where possible.

@nuclearGoblin ; @juditbergfalk ; @joohlz ; @frankie-768

[juditbergfalk]

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

EDITORIAL TASKS

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references

# Ask Whedon to check repository statistics for the submitted software
@whedon check repository

[juditbergfalk]

Hello @jgorzalski !
I would like to add Ian Hawke to @villaa 's list of reviewers. Reviewer has astrophysics knowledge.
Thank you

[juditbergfalk]

@whedon list reviewers

[whedon]

Here's the current list of reviewers: https://bit.ly/jose-reviewers

[villaa]

@jgorzalski My team has made some upgrades so we would like to change the review version here to v3.0.0, thanks.

[labarba]

@whedon invite @moorepants

[whedon]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@whedon commands

[labarba]

@whedon invite @moorepants as editor

[whedon]

@moorepants has been invited to edit this submission.

[villaa]

@labarba I don't know if you're able, but please update the review version here to v3.0.0, thanks.

[moorepants]

@labarba I'm on vacation for the next three weeks. I could pick this up in late August or early September.

[labarba]

@whedon set v3.0.0 as version

[whedon]

OK. v3.0.0 is the version.

[labarba]

👋 @moorepants – Thank you! We are currently short of editors (two out on parental leave), so we'll wait for you here.

[moorepants]

@whedon assign @moorepants as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @moorepants

[moorepants]

@IanHawke, @ali-ramadhan, @ntmoore, and @Carreau would any of you like to review this JOSE submission about an education module for simulating galaxies?

[Carreau]

Sure, I can do that.

[moorepants]

@Carreau Great! Thanks for volunteering. I hope to get 1 more reviewer before we officially start, but feel free to have a look at the paper before then.

[Carreau]

Sérsic bulges(Edo Noordermeer,2008),

Missing space before the opening bracket if we compare to other citations – I don't know if the authors want to fix that.

I also see on the repository that the author have packaged everything to be available on Binder – that I have started to play with and would have love to have 15 years ago in my cosmo classes – maybe the author want to say one or two sentence as to whether they feel it is better to have local install for users to retain their work and. have a working environment, or prefer the ease of use of the an ephemeral binder ?

[moorepants]

@whedon add @Carreau as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @Carreau is now a reviewer

[moorepants]

Ok, I've found a second reviewer. Joel Noel-Storr (@noelstoj) has agreed to review.

[moorepants]

@whedon add @noelstoj as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @noelstoj is now a reviewer

[moorepants]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #184.