-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: areal: An R package for areal weighted interpolation #1187
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @lheagy it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper 🎉 For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
What happens now? This submission is currently in a You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here. |
|
👋 @lheagy - the submitting author suggested you as the handling editor. |
PDF failed to compile for issue #1187 with the following error: % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 Looks like we failed to compile the PDF |
The following three people from google doc all list GIS and |
I'm wondering if this failed because of the use of backticks in the heading? If so, I can remove and re-push... |
This failure is due to a bug we recently introduced into our LaTeX template. I'll fix this shortly and let you know when it's updated. |
OK, thanks for letting me know @arfon! |
👋 Hi @chris-prener, thanks for your submission! Do you have any recommendations for reviewers? |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
PDF failed to compile for issue #1187 with the following error: % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 Looks like we failed to compile the PDF |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
Hi @lheagy - the following three people from google doc all list GIS and R as areas/languages of interest: nuest, jsta, sjsrey. |
Hi Lindsey,
I would be happy to help - with the one caveat that I can't start on this
for another two weeks as I have several other reviews in my queue that I am
committed to.
s.
Sergio (Serge) Rey
Founding Director, Center for Geospatial Sciences
Professor, School of Public Policy
University of California, Riverside
sergio.rey@ucr.edu
…On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 10:41 AM Lindsey Heagy ***@***.***> wrote:
👋 Hi @nuest <https://github.com/nuest>, @sjsrey
<https://github.com/sjsrey>, would you be willing to review this
submission for JOSS?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1187 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHNGqesH4N2vH9w1O4OsvHE4mf3N3Z_ks5vHfLvgaJpZM4aJIL2>
.
|
Thanks @sjsrey, that timeline is fine. Best of luck with the other reviews on your list. |
OK, the reviewer is @sjsrey |
Hi! I can't do it, but may I suggest @edzer ? This is right down his alley. |
Sure. Could you please point me to the guidelines for reviewers? |
Excellent, thank you @edzer! The guidelines for the review process are here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Shortly, I will close this issues and open another that contains a checklist that will help guide the review process. Please let me know if you have any questions or if I can provide further clarification. |
OK, @edzer is now a reviewer |
@whedon start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #1221. Feel free to close this issue now! |
Submitting author: @chris-prener (Christopher Prener)
Repository: https://github.com/slu-openGIS/areal
Version: v0.1.3
Editor: @lheagy
Reviewers: @sjsrey, @edzer
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @chris-prener. The JOSS editor @lheagy, will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.
@chris-prener if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: