[PRE REVIEW]: UTDEventData: An R package to access political event data

[whedon]

Submitting author: @KateHyoung (Hyoungah Kim)
Repository: https://github.com/KateHyoung/UTDEventData
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @alexhanna
Reviewers: @briatte, @andrewheiss

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @KateHyoung. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@KateHyoung if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience 😸

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

PDF failed to compile for issue #1319 with the following error:

ORCID looks to be the wrong length
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-01ece1d1d135/lib/whedon.rb:91:in block in check_orcids': Problem with ORCID (000-0002-9300-1576) for Latifur Khan (RuntimeError) from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-01ece1d1d135/lib/whedon.rb:89:in each'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-01ece1d1d135/lib/whedon.rb:89:in check_orcids' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-01ece1d1d135/lib/whedon.rb:70:in initialize'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-01ece1d1d135/lib/whedon/processor.rb:32:in new' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-01ece1d1d135/lib/whedon/processor.rb:32:in set_paper'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-01ece1d1d135/bin/whedon:55:in prepare' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/command.rb:27:in run'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/invocation.rb:126:in invoke_command' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor.rb:387:in dispatch'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/base.rb:466:in start' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-01ece1d1d135/bin/whedon:116:in <top (required)>'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bin/whedon:23:in load' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bin/whedon:23:in

'

[arfon]

👋 @KateHyoung - it looks like one of the ORCIDs is missing a 0 here?

[arfon]

@openjournals/joss-eics - the submitting author suggested @arokem as the handling editor.

[KateHyoung]

Thank you, @arfon, I have fixed it.

[KateHyoung]

As following @whedon recommendations, here is a list of potential reviewers

• @earino
• @andrewheiss
• @alexhanna
• @briatte

[briatte]

@KateHyoung Would be happy to review (and learn how reviewing for JOSS works in practice, by the same occasion)!

[andrewheiss]

I'm also fine reviewing!

[alexhanna]

Happy to see this in submission!

[labarba]

Since we already have two volunteers willing to contribute a review, I'll assign @alexhanna to handle as editor. Thanks everybody!

[labarba]

@whedon assign @alexhanna as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @alexhanna

[labarba]

@whedon assign @briatte as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @briatte

[labarba]

@whedon add @andrewheiss as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @andrewheiss is now a reviewer

[labarba]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #1322. Feel free to close this issue now!