Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: kdensity: An R package for kernel density estimation with parametric starts and asymmetric kernels #1565

Closed
whedon opened this issue Jul 11, 2019 · 24 comments

Comments

@whedon
Copy link

whedon commented Jul 11, 2019

Submitting author: @JonasMoss (Jonas Moss)
Repository: https://github.com/JonasMoss/kdensity
Version: v1.0.1
Editor: @terrytangyuan
Reviewers: @gvegayon

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @JonasMoss. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@JonasMoss if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jul 11, 2019

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience 😸

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jul 11, 2019

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jul 11, 2019

PDF failed to compile for issue #1565 with the following error:

Error producing PDF.
! Undefined control sequence.
l.370 The following example uses the \code

Looks like we failed to compile the PDF

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Jul 11, 2019

👋 @terrytangyuan - would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Jul 11, 2019

@JonasMoss - I don't think Pandoc supports \code. Can you use back-ticks instead?

@terrytangyuan
Copy link
Member

terrytangyuan commented Jul 11, 2019

@arfon Yes definitely.

@JonasMoss if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

@terrytangyuan
Copy link
Member

@whedon assign @terrytangyuan as editor

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jul 11, 2019

OK, the editor is @terrytangyuan

@JonasMoss
Copy link

Changed \code to backticks. I suggest @trashbirdecology for reviewing.

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Jul 12, 2019

@whedon generate pdf

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jul 12, 2019

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jul 12, 2019

@trashbirdecology
Copy link

@JonasMoss @terrytangyuan Unfortunately I am slammed for the next two weeks. If you OK with waiting for a review I am happy to begin it near or after 01 August.

@terrytangyuan
Copy link
Member

@trashbirdecology Thanks for letting us know. @JonasMoss Could you try finding more reviewers from the list and see if others might have better availability?

@JonasMoss
Copy link

@trashbirdecology thanks! I suggest @gvegayon.

@terrytangyuan
Copy link
Member

Thanks. Hi @gvegayon, would you be able to review for this paper?

@gvegayon
Copy link

👋 @terrytangyuan @JonasMoss, sure, I can help :). My only problem is that I'm on a conference next week, so I can start with the review process on the 22nd. LMK

@trashbirdecology
Copy link

If anything changes please email me (jessicaleighburnett.at.gmail), I am muting this thread, now. Thanks!

@JonasMoss
Copy link

@gvegayon @terrytangyuan Sounds great to me! Thanks =)

@terrytangyuan
Copy link
Member

@whedon assign @gvegayon as reviewer

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jul 12, 2019

OK, the reviewer is @gvegayon

@terrytangyuan
Copy link
Member

@whedon start review

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Jul 12, 2019

OK, I've started the review over in #1566. Feel free to close this issue now!

@terrytangyuan
Copy link
Member

Thanks everyone! @gvegayon Please head over to #1566 for review when you get back.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants