[PRE REVIEW]: AliasFinder: A Python script to search for the true planetary frequency within radial velocity data

[whedon]

Submitting author: @StephanStock (Stephan Stock)
Repository: https://github.com/JonasKemmer/AliasFinder
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @xuanxu
Reviewers: @Juanlu001, @wtgee

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @StephanStock. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@StephanStock if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience 😸

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

[arfon]

@StephanStock - this looks to be a duplicate of #1724 which was rejected as being out of scope. Could you clarify why there has been a resubmission?

/ cc @danielskatz

[StephanStock]

Hello,
as requested in #1724 we implemented the pip install for our software which was the reason why it was rejected. It is now 'designed for maintainable extension'.

/cc @JonasKemmer @xuanxu

[danielskatz]

👋 @xuanxu - can I ask you to take the lead on making sure this is now suitable, and if so, editing it?

[xuanxu]

@danielskatz yes, I'll edit it.

[xuanxu]

I think in its current form it qualifies as a maintainable research software, so I'm moving this forward

[xuanxu]

👋 @Juanlu001: Are you still willing to review this paper? It is an improved resubmission of #1724

[xuanxu]

@whedon assign @xuanxu as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @xuanxu

[astrojuanlu]

Excellent! @xuanxu I will gladly review

[xuanxu]

@Juanlu001 great!, I'll start the review issue once I find the second reviewer, stay tuned!

[xuanxu]

👋 @ygrange - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? I think your knowledge of Python and Astronomy makes you a good fit for this submission.

[StephanStock]

As a potential reviewer we also suggest @nespinoza who also works with Exoplanets

[ygrange]

Well, I am pretty busy the coming two weeks at least, so maybe it would be wise to have another reviewer.
If there is no second reviewer and you are willing to wait a few weeks, I can do it though.

[xuanxu]

@ygrange: ok, thanks!, let's see if I can find another reviewer

[xuanxu]

👋 @wtgee - would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? I think your knowledge of Python and Exoplanets makes you a great fit for this submission.

[wtgee]

@xuanxu yes, I have some time to do this. And I like the potential pun on 'fit'. :)

[xuanxu]

@wtgee great, thanks!

[xuanxu]

@whedon add @Juanlu001 as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @Juanlu001 is now a reviewer

[xuanxu]

@whedon add @wtgee as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @wtgee is now a reviewer

[xuanxu]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #1771. Feel free to close this issue now!

[xuanxu]

@Juanlu001, @wtgee - please head over to #1771 where the review will take place.