-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: CaPS: Casimir Effect in the Plane-Sphere Geometry #1907
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
What happens now? This submission is currently in a You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here. |
|
|
|
Hi @michael-hartmann and thanks for your submission. Please add to your paper to include:
and possibly also
which is hard to discern from this outside perspective currently. We want to see a clear research use stated clearly. |
I'm going to mark this as paused for now - @michael-hartmann, please let us know when you have addressed the previous points. |
@whedon generate pdf |
|
Thank you for your suggestions. We have addressed the previous points by (i) extending the introduction for a non-specific audience, and (ii) adding references to experiments that have used data generated with our software. We hope that the review can now continue. :-) |
@whedon check references |
|
|
Sorry for the delay in getting back to this - our rotating associate editor-in-chief system showed some flaws over the holidays |
@whedon assign @danielskatz as editor |
OK, the editor is @danielskatz |
@michael-hartmann - do you have any suggestions for potential reviewers? If so, please mention them here in this thread, without @-tagging them. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission. Please take a look and see if you see any potentially-applicable reviewers. |
@danielskatz Thank you for your reply. I had a look at the list of JOSS reviewers and think jochym and jwuttke are good candidates. Both have a background in theoretical physics, experience in scattering (might be helpful), and listed C among their programming languages. |
👋 @jochym - Would you be willing to review this for JOSS? |
👋 @jwuttke - Would you be willing to review this for JOSS? |
👋 @eschnett & @stevenrbrandt - would either of you be willing to review this, or have suggestions for others who might? |
What are reviewers supposed to do? |
Sorry, I thought you were familiar with JOSS - see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html for general info about the reviewing process, and https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html for the specific review criteria. In brief, a JOSS review is of the short paper and the software repository, and it is open and collaborative, seeking to improve the paper and software to the point where they can be accepted. |
@danielskatz I accept. |
@jwuttke - are you willing to be a reviewer for this? |
OK, @eschnett is now a reviewer |
Thanks @eschnett - we'll start the review once we get another reviewer assigned |
ok, I'll give it a try |
will we get some more instructions, or shall we just start, following the guidelines linked above? |
I'll add you, then create an issue for the review, which will have instructions |
OK, @jwuttke is now a reviewer |
@whedon start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #2011. Feel free to close this issue now! |
Submitting author: @michael-hartmann (Michael Hartmann)
Repository: https://github.com/michael-hartmann/caps/
Version: 0.5
Editor: @danielskatz
Reviewers: @eschnett, @jwuttke
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @michael-hartmann. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@michael-hartmann if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: