[PRE REVIEW]: Analysing 24-hour behaviour sequence data with an Rshiny application

[whedon]

Submitting author: @jcolomb (Colomb, J.)
Repository: https://github.com/jcolomb/HCS_analysis
Version: v0.1.3
Editor: @danielskatz
Reviewers: @mikerspencer, @aj2duncan
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @jcolomb. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@jcolomb if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[arfon]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=1.30 s (64.8 files/s, 16664.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSS                              1              0             14           6844
R                               65           1659           1494           4487
SVG                              1              1              1           3708
HTML                             6            279             18           1426
TeX                              4             31              4            673
Rmd                              3            259            183            243
Markdown                         4            115              0            163
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            84           2344           1714          17544
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[whedon]

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

[arfon]

👋 @danielskatz - would you be willing to edit this for JOSS?

[arfon]

@whedon invite @danielskatz as editor

[whedon]

@danielskatz has been invited to edit this submission.

[danielskatz]

@whedon assign me as editor

@arfon - I don't think this will work, but it should

[danielskatz]

not even an error...

[danielskatz]

@whedon assign @danielskatz as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @danielskatz

[danielskatz]

👋 @jcolomb - thanks for your submission to JOSS. Could you take a look a this list of potential reviewers and identify a few people who would be good candidates to review this submission?

[arfon]

@whedon assign me as editor

@arfon - I don't think this will work, but it should

Agreed. It should!

[jcolomb]

looking for R, machine learning, statistics, (and not epidemiology) none found for Rshiny.
(PS would be cool to have a possibility to filter that list, maybe directly from the result of whedon software report ?).

nhejazi
jayrobwilliams
ati-ozgur
rcannood

[danielskatz]

We have a bunch of ideas for potential changes in progress to make this process better, and hope to start implementing them soon

[danielskatz]

👋 @nhejazi - Would you be willing to review this submission?

[danielskatz]

👋 @jayrobwilliams - Would you be willing to review this submission?

[danielskatz]

👋 @ati-ozgur - Would you be willing to review this submission?

[danielskatz]

👋 @rcannood - Would you be willing to review this submission?

[jayrobwilliams]

@danielskatz unfortunately I don't have time to review this submission at the moment.

[danielskatz]

👋 @nhejazi, @ati-ozgur, @rcannood - Would you be willing to review this JOSS submission?

[danielskatz]

👋 @jcolomb - Can I ask if you might have additional thoughts on potential reviewers?

[danielskatz]

👋 @amoeba, @brylie, @DominiqueMakowski, @mikerspencer, @aj2duncan - would one or two of you be willing to review this JOSS submission?

[DominiqueMakowski]

Hi @danielskatz, thanks for the invite, unfortunately, I feel like this is really outside my domain. Sorry, and good luck!

[mikerspencer]

Yes, I can review this. It's my first piece for this journal, so I may need a little hand-holding.

[aj2duncan]

@danielskatz I'm happy to review this too.

[danielskatz]

Thanks to @mikerspencer and @aj2duncan - we will go ahead with a review in a few minutes (and in a new thread after more commands to whedon). Mike, please feel free to ask questions as needed, but I hope the fact that the process is checklist-driven will make this reasonably clear and easy.

[danielskatz]

@whedon assign @mikerspencer as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @mikerspencer is now a reviewer

[danielskatz]

@whedon add @aj2duncan as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @aj2duncan is now a reviewer

[danielskatz]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #2282.