[PRE REVIEW]: HOODESolver.jl: A Julia package for highly oscillatory problems

[whedon]

Submitting author: @pnavaro (Pierre Navaro)
Repository: https://github.com/ymocquar/HOODESolver.jl
Version: v0.2.3
Editor: @vissarion
Reviewers: @ranocha, @HaoZeke
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @pnavaro. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @dpsanders.

@pnavaro if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.66 s (89.8 files/s, 83205.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia                           40            308            282          51677
Markdown                         9            194              0            494
YAML                             4              7              1            110
TeX                              2              1              0             61
TOML                             3              4              0             37
Jupyter Notebook                 1              0           1485             36
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            59            514           1768          52415
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '34c9d2edb6cc8ed08ae267e3' was
gathered on 2021/02/17.
No commited files with the specified extensions were found.

[whedon]

PDF failed to compile for issue #3044 with the following error:

Can't find any papers to compile :-(

[pnavaro]

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

EDITORIAL TASKS

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references

# Ask Whedon to check repository statistics for the submitted software
@whedon check repository

[pnavaro]

@whedon generate pdf from branch paper

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch paper. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[pnavaro]

According to the list, Hendrik Ranocha ranocha is a potential reviewer

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@mjsottile @diehlpk @melissawm could one of you edit this submission? Thanks

[diehlpk]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman I could do it, however, I would prefer if someone else can do it since I have plenty of submissions right now.

[mjsottile]

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman I'm at my capacity for the moment, so I can't take a new paper right now.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@vissarion @arfon would this be a nice first submission to handle?

[arfon]

@whedon invite @vissarion as editor

[whedon]

@vissarion has been invited to edit this submission.

[vissarion]

@whedon assign me as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @vissarion

[vissarion]

@pnavaro the submission is in scope, I am searching for potential reviewers

[vissarion]

@dawbarton @ranocha Would you be willing to contribute a review for this JOSS submission?

[ranocha]

@vissarion I can review the submission but I will probably not have enough time for it in the immediate future (next weeks), but probably around end of March or beginning of April.

[vissarion]

@ranocha according to current difficult circumstances, "end of March or beginning of April" sounds OK for me. Thanks for accepting!

[vissarion]

@whedon assign @ranocha as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @ranocha is now a reviewer

[dawbarton]

Apologies I'm snowed under with teaching duties at the moment and I'm not going to have time to look at this in the near future

[vissarion]

@dawbarton no problem, thanks for the reply.

[vissarion]

👋 @ysimillides, @HaoZeke, @yangbai90, @raghurama123, @Datseris, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[HaoZeke]

Hi @vissarion, I'd be happy to review this submission, thanks.

[vissarion]

@HaoZeke thanks for replying in a flash.

[vissarion]

@whedon add @HaoZeke as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @HaoZeke is now a reviewer

[vissarion]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #3077.