[PRE REVIEW]: Taguette: open-source qualitative data analysis #3513

whedon · 2021-07-19T21:01:19Z

Submitting author: @remram44 (Rémi Rampin)
Repository: https://gitlab.com/remram44/taguette
Version: 1.0.0
Editor: @Nikoleta-v3
Reviewers: @alexhanna , @cmaimone
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/41a812345a7342402c65c51dc7381774"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/41a812345a7342402c65c51dc7381774/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/41a812345a7342402c65c51dc7381774/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/41a812345a7342402c65c51dc7381774)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @remram44. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@remram44 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

whedon · 2021-07-19T21:01:23Z

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

whedon · 2021-07-19T21:01:38Z

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.13 s (689.2 files/s, 169022.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          28            999            661           5945
SVG                              5              0             32           4550
PO File                         12           1110           1457           3105
JavaScript                       5            179            143           1484
HTML                            20             92             17            928
Markdown                         5            136              0            374
CSS                              3             69             29            282
YAML                             1              8              0            107
TOML                             1             12              1             60
INI                              1             18              0             56
reStructuredText                 1             34              0             52
Bourne Shell                     5             10              1             51
Dockerfile                       1             10              4             23
Mako                             1              7              0             17
diff                             1              0              4              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            90           2684           2349          17040
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '9cdb889532b433c284681012' was
gathered on 2021/07/19.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Guillaume Deflaux                2             3              4            0.03
Kosovskih Svyatoslav             1            21              0            0.10
Mikaël Francoeur                 1             2              2            0.02
Remi Rampin                    648         14871           5517           99.58
Vicky Steeves                    4            34              6            0.20
vagrant                          2            12              3            0.07

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Guillaume Deflaux             3          100.0          4.3                0.00
Kosovskih Svyatoslav          6           28.6         21.6                0.00
Mikaël Francoeur              2          100.0         18.7                0.00
Remi Rampin                9390           63.1         19.0                6.25
Vicky Steeves                 2            5.9         32.2                0.00
vagrant                       8           66.7         32.9                0.00

whedon · 2021-07-19T21:01:46Z

PDF failed to compile for issue #3513 with the following error:

 Can't find any papers to compile :-(

danielskatz · 2021-07-19T21:07:32Z

@whedon check references from branch 2021-joss-paper

whedon · 2021-07-19T21:07:35Z

Attempting to check references... from custom branch 2021-joss-paper

danielskatz · 2021-07-19T21:08:19Z

@whedon generate pdf from branch 2021-joss-paper

whedon · 2021-07-19T21:08:21Z

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch 2021-joss-paper. Reticulating splines etc...

whedon · 2021-07-19T21:08:28Z

PDF failed to compile for issue #3513 with the following error:

 /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-b63fc70cc085/lib/whedon.rb:146:in `check_fields': undefined method `keys' for "<!-- Preview this with https://whedon.theoj.org/ -->":String (NoMethodError)
	from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-b63fc70cc085/lib/whedon.rb:89:in `initialize'
	from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-b63fc70cc085/lib/whedon/processor.rb:38:in `new'
	from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-b63fc70cc085/lib/whedon/processor.rb:38:in `set_paper'
	from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-b63fc70cc085/bin/whedon:58:in `prepare'
	from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/command.rb:27:in `run'
	from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/invocation.rb:126:in `invoke_command'
	from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor.rb:387:in `dispatch'
	from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/thor-0.20.3/lib/thor/base.rb:466:in `start'
	from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bundler/gems/whedon-b63fc70cc085/bin/whedon:131:in `<top (required)>'
	from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bin/whedon:23:in `load'
	from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/bin/whedon:23:in `<main>'

remram44 · 2021-07-19T21:10:48Z

I removed the  comment

remram44 · 2021-07-19T21:12:22Z

@whedon generate pdf

whedon · 2021-07-19T21:12:31Z

PDF failed to compile for issue #3513 with the following error:

 Can't find any papers to compile :-(

remram44 · 2021-07-19T21:13:23Z

@whedon generate pdf from branch 2021-joss-paper

whedon · 2021-07-19T21:13:26Z

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch 2021-joss-paper. Reticulating splines etc...

whedon · 2021-07-19T21:13:47Z

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

danielskatz · 2021-07-19T21:16:43Z

@whedon check references from branch 2021-joss-paper

whedon · 2021-07-19T21:16:45Z

Attempting to check references... from custom branch 2021-joss-paper

whedon · 2021-07-19T21:16:53Z

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

danielskatz · 2021-07-19T21:19:31Z

👋 @remram44 - we're currently overloaded on editors in the area of this submission, so I'm going to mark it as waitlisted until an editor is available - thanks for submitting it and quickly cleaning up the build issue

danielskatz · 2021-07-20T14:55:40Z

👋 @Nikoleta-v3 - would this be another submission you can edit?

danielskatz · 2021-07-20T14:55:48Z

@whedon invite @Nikoleta-v3 as editor

whedon · 2021-07-20T14:55:51Z

@Nikoleta-v3 has been invited to edit this submission.

Nikoleta-v3 · 2021-07-20T14:59:51Z

@whedon assign me as editor

whedon · 2021-07-20T14:59:55Z

OK, the editor is @Nikoleta-v3

Nikoleta-v3 · 2021-07-20T15:01:02Z

👋🏻 @remram44 thank you for your submission with JOSS, if you have not already done so, could you take a look through https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers to suggest some potential reviewers 😄

danielskatz · 2021-07-20T15:04:31Z

👋 @Nikoleta-v3 - thanks for editing this. (just as a note, if you take something from the waiting list, you should remove that label, which I will do in this case)

remram44 · 2021-07-20T15:23:28Z

Thanks, reviewers with "Python" and "social science" are probably good reviewers:

tresoldi
vaneseltine
soodoku
alexhanna
jboynyc
natematias
zhanglipku
cmaimone
ajoer
Kudusch
sdmccabe

Nikoleta-v3 · 2021-07-20T15:50:17Z

@danielskatz got it 👍🏻 thank you!

Nikoleta-v3 · 2021-07-21T15:40:46Z

👋 @ajoer & @soodoku & @alexhanna & @cmaimone would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "Taguette: open-source qualitative data analysis". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue 🆙

Please let me know if you're available 😄 Thank you!

soodoku · 2021-07-21T15:46:42Z

hola, @Nikoleta-v3! love the intent behind the package. i don't think i have the right skills to review this package well so i am going to pass. but thank you for pinging me!

alexhanna · 2021-07-21T16:12:15Z

Ooh I'm quite familiar with Taguette -- actually yes, I can do this.

…

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 8:46 AM soodoku ***@***.***> wrote: hola, @Nikoleta-v3 <https://github.com/Nikoleta-v3>! love the intent behind the package. i don't think i have the right skills to review this package well so i am going to pass. but thank you for pinging me! — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3513 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGC6DMYON4SRQMBAXXW2UTTY3TW5ANCNFSM5AUOW36Q> .

-- Alex Hanna, PhD alex-hanna.com Senior Research Scientist | Google Lecturer | UC Berkeley School of Information

cmaimone · 2021-07-21T19:07:00Z

Yes, I can review this

Nikoleta-v3 · 2021-07-22T11:47:48Z

@whedon assign @alexhanna as reviewer

whedon · 2021-07-22T11:47:53Z

OK, @alexhanna is now a reviewer

Nikoleta-v3 · 2021-07-22T11:48:13Z

@whedon add @cmaimone as reviewer

whedon · 2021-07-22T11:48:18Z

OK, @cmaimone is now a reviewer

Nikoleta-v3 · 2021-07-22T13:15:33Z

@whedon start review

whedon · 2021-07-22T13:15:37Z

OK, I've started the review over in #3522.

whedon added the pre-review label Jul 19, 2021

whedon added Mako Python Shell labels Jul 19, 2021

danielskatz added the waitlisted Submissions in the JOSS backlog due to reduced service mode. label Jul 19, 2021

whedon assigned Nikoleta-v3 Jul 20, 2021

danielskatz removed the waitlisted Submissions in the JOSS backlog due to reduced service mode. label Jul 20, 2021

whedon assigned alexhanna and Nikoleta-v3 and unassigned Nikoleta-v3 Jul 22, 2021

whedon assigned alexhanna, cmaimone and Nikoleta-v3 and unassigned alexhanna and Nikoleta-v3 Jul 22, 2021

whedon closed this as completed Jul 22, 2021

[PRE REVIEW]: Taguette: open-source qualitative data analysis #3513

[PRE REVIEW]: Taguette: open-source qualitative data analysis #3513

Comments

whedon commented Jul 19, 2021 • edited

Status

whedon commented Jul 19, 2021

whedon commented Jul 19, 2021

whedon commented Jul 19, 2021

danielskatz commented Jul 19, 2021

whedon commented Jul 19, 2021

danielskatz commented Jul 19, 2021

whedon commented Jul 19, 2021

whedon commented Jul 19, 2021

remram44 commented Jul 19, 2021

remram44 commented Jul 19, 2021

whedon commented Jul 19, 2021

remram44 commented Jul 19, 2021

whedon commented Jul 19, 2021

whedon commented Jul 19, 2021

danielskatz commented Jul 19, 2021

whedon commented Jul 19, 2021

whedon commented Jul 19, 2021

danielskatz commented Jul 19, 2021

danielskatz commented Jul 20, 2021

danielskatz commented Jul 20, 2021

whedon commented Jul 20, 2021

Nikoleta-v3 commented Jul 20, 2021

whedon commented Jul 20, 2021

Nikoleta-v3 commented Jul 20, 2021

danielskatz commented Jul 20, 2021

remram44 commented Jul 20, 2021

Nikoleta-v3 commented Jul 20, 2021

Nikoleta-v3 commented Jul 21, 2021

soodoku commented Jul 21, 2021

alexhanna commented Jul 21, 2021 via email

cmaimone commented Jul 21, 2021

Nikoleta-v3 commented Jul 22, 2021

whedon commented Jul 22, 2021

Nikoleta-v3 commented Jul 22, 2021

whedon commented Jul 22, 2021

Nikoleta-v3 commented Jul 22, 2021

whedon commented Jul 22, 2021

whedon commented Jul 19, 2021 •

edited