[PRE REVIEW]: PySS3: A new interpretable and simple machine learning model for text classification

[whedon]

Submitting author: @sergioburdisso (Sergio Gastón Burdisso)
Repository: https://github.com/sergioburdisso/pyss3
Version: v0.6.4
Editor: @bmcfee
Reviewers: @hbaniecki, @kmichael08
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/872acc280f71e2a26e249d65dd399acd"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/872acc280f71e2a26e249d65dd399acd/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/872acc280f71e2a26e249d65dd399acd/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/872acc280f71e2a26e249d65dd399acd)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @sergioburdisso. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@sergioburdisso if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1642

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.35 s (193.9 files/s, 91315.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSS                              6           1361            375           7369
Python                          10           1460           2144           5469
HTML                             5            429              6           4772
reStructuredText                20           1452           1207           1017
JavaScript                      10             85            193            897
Markdown                         6            208              0            392
Jupyter Notebook                 6              0           2668            276
TeX                              1             12              0            113
YAML                             2              8              5             46
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            68           5027           6606          20386
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository 'cc4994dc5d00d54aa9536cbb' was
gathered on 2021/11/12.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Florian Angermeir                1            19             19            0.20
Sergio Burdisso                202         14552           4147           99.80

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Florian Angermeir            18           94.7         16.4               22.22
Sergio Burdisso           10258           70.5         10.0                6.19

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1371/journal.pone.0168344 may be a valid DOI for title: Rumor detection over varying time windows
- 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.07.040 may be a valid DOI for title: Early detection of deception and aggressiveness using profile-based representations
- 10.1007/978-3-319-44564-9_3 may be a valid DOI for title: A test collection for research on depression and language use
- 10.1007/978-3-319-65813-1_30 may be a valid DOI for title: eRisk 2017: CLEF Lab on Early Risk Prediction on the Internet: Experimental foundations

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.05.023 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2020.07.001 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[kyleniemeyer]

Hi @sergioburdisso, we will use this issue to find and assign editor and reviewers. While we are doing that, could you resolve those issues with the DOIs in your references?

@bmcfee could you edit this submission?

[kyleniemeyer]

@whedon invite @bmcfee as editor

[whedon]

@bmcfee has been invited to edit this submission.

[bmcfee]

@whedon assign @bmcfee as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @bmcfee

[bmcfee]

@whedon assign @hbaniecki as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @hbaniecki is now a reviewer

[bmcfee]

Note: @hbaniecki has agreed to review, but won't be available for another week or so.

[sergioburdisso]

Hi guys! thank you for consider my submission :)

Hi @sergioburdisso, we will use this issue to find and assign editor and reviewers. While we are doing that, could you resolve those issues with the DOIs in your references?

Hi! yes, I've just updated the DOIs and pushed the changes to the repository. 🚀 thank you for the suggestion.

Note: @hbaniecki has agreed to review, but won't be available for another week or so.

Ok. No problem, so we will wait until @hbaniecki is available then 👍

Again, thank you guys for taking the time to process and reviewing this submission! 💪

[bmcfee]

@whedon add @kmichael08 as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @kmichael08 is now a reviewer

[bmcfee]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #3934.

[bmcfee]

I've opened up the review issue, but it may still be a little bit before our reviewers are available to get started on it. This way it will at least be ready to go when they are.