-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: rbmi: A R package for standard and reference-based multiple imputation methods #4224
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
Wordcount for |
|
@nociale thanks for this submission. I am the AEiC on call for the coming week and will be looking for a handling editor. In the meantime perhaps you can address those potentially missing DOIs ☝️ , you can update the paper by calling |
@nociale I have just assigned the |
Hi @fboehm, are you interested in editing this submission? |
@editorialbot invite @fboehm as editor |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
Yes, @kthyng , I'm happy to edit this submission. Thank you! |
@editorialbot assign @fboehm as editor |
Assigned! @fboehm is now the editor |
@editorialbot list reviewers |
Here's the current list of reviewers: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers |
@JoranTiU, @stmcg, @DanielRivasMD, @jaybee84 - would any of you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, JOSS reviews involve downloading and installing the software, and inspecting the repository Editors and reviewers post comments on the Review issue, and authors respond to the comments |
@fboehm I can take a look. First time on this journal so some guidance and / or advice would be appreciated along the way |
Thanks, @DanielRivasMD ! If you decide that you'd like to review this, please let me know. I'm happy to guide you through the process of reviewing for JOSS. You would need to install the R package and verify its functionality. You would also need to read the accompanying paper and ensure that it meets specified expectations. If you decide to review this submission, I'll prepare a standard checklist for you to complete. Unlike many journals, you are not expected to write a document that contains your review for the JOSS submission. Instead, you merely complete a checklist. A JOSS review is an iterative process, so you'll first download and install the R package and try to run it. Perhaps something won't work as indicated, in which case you'd tell the authors about it via our review thread. Nearly every submission that gets reviewed eventually gets published, once the reviewers are satisfied with any needed modifications. I hope that this helps. |
To get a sense of the checklist items, please see this ongoing review: #4242 |
Please note, @DanielRivasMD , that you don't need to do anything until I ask you to do it. If you decide to review, it would be a few days before we start the review process, since I'll need to find a second reviewer. We typically ask that you complete the first round of review within about a month. |
Sounds great! Let's do it! I read the article, and will install and test the software, is this the review thread where I should comment? Or where can I find it? |
Ahhh great! Good to know. I'll wait for further instructions then |
Thanks, @DanielRivasMD ! The review thread doesn't exist yet - I'll make it once we find a second reviewer. In the mean time, if you have comments to share with me or the authors, please feel free to share them here. We'll then switch over to the review thread once I find a second reviewer. |
@editorialbot assign @DanielRivasMD as reviewer |
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
|
@editorialbot commands |
Hello @fboehm, here are the things you can ask me to do:
|
@editorialbot add @DanielRivasMD as reviewer |
@DanielRivasMD added to the reviewers list! |
I can be a second reviewer on this 😊 |
I am happy to review this. Thanks, |
Thanks so much, @JoranTiU, @jaybee84 and @stmcg ! @stmcg - I'll be certain to ask you again when you're less busy. @JoranTiU - I'll assign you as a second reviewer. @jaybee84 - I hope that we can work together on a future submission. I saw that @JoranTiU responded just before you, so I've assigned them as the second reviewer. We should need only two reviewers for this submission. Regardless, @jaybee84 - I really appreciate your willingness to help out, and I'll have to ask you to review a future submission. Thanks, everyone! |
@editorialbot add @JoranTiU as reviewer |
@JoranTiU added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot begin review |
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
|
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #4251. |
Hi all,
I can be the second reviewer on this 😊
Vriendelijke groet/Kind Regards,
Joran
Joran Jongerling | Assistant-Professor | Department of Methodology and Statistics | Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences | Simon Building, room S706
Van: Daniel Rivas ***@***.***>
Verzonden: donderdag 17 maart 2022 1:49
Aan: openjournals/joss-reviews ***@***.***>
CC: Joran Jongerling ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***>
Onderwerp: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: rbmi: A R package for standard and reference-based multiple imputation methods (Issue #4224)
Sounds great! Let's do it! I read the article, and will install and test the software, is this the review thread where I should comment? Or where can I find it?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#4224 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVCJOPBRRSATZJMNFYWK6ZLVAMS37ANCNFSM5QADS2YQ>.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.******@***.***>>
|
@JoranTiU - Thank you so much for the offer! We've actually completed the review for this submission. I hope that you and I can work together on a future submission. Thanks again! |
I hope so too 😊. And you’re very welcome 😊
Vriendelijke groet/Kind Regards,
Joran
Joran Jongerling | Assistant-Professor/Co-Director of TESC | Department of Methodology and Statistics | Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences | Reitse Poort, Room RP 15 | https://experiencesampling.nl/person/joran-jongerling/
***@***.***
From: Frederick Boehm ***@***.***>
Sent: zondag 16 oktober 2022 4:38
To: openjournals/joss-reviews ***@***.***>
Cc: Joran Jongerling ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: rbmi: A R package for standard and reference-based multiple imputation methods (Issue #4224)
@JoranTiU<https://github.com/JoranTiU> - Thank you so much for the offer! We've actually completed the review for this submission. I hope that you and I can work together on a future submission. Thanks again!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#4224 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVCJOPGTEB5ZEB2IRVPD243WDQHMNANCNFSM5QADS2YQ>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Submitting author: @nociale (Alessandro Noci)
Repository: https://github.com/insightsengineering/rbmi
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 1.1.0
Editor: @fboehm
Reviewers: @DanielRivasMD, @JoranTiU
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @nociale. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@nociale if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: