New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: DeBIR: A Python Package for Dense Bi-Encoder Information Retrieval #4920
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
Checking the BibTeX entries failed with the following error:
|
|
Wordcount for |
@editorialbot generate pdf |
Hi, this is the new track editor, @gkthiruvathukal checking in. I am working to get this and a growing number of track submissions reviewed. Please do bear with me (and JOSS) as there is a bit of a backlog with many of our editors at maximum number of assignments they can edit at the moment. Thank you for your patience and understanding. |
@editorialbot assign me as editor |
Assigned! @arfon is now the editor |
👋 @gkthiruvathukal – I can take this one. |
@Ayuei – could you take a look a this list of potential reviewers and identify a few people who would be good candidates to review this submission? |
Apologies for the late response. But good candidates would be those with a background in information retrieval and natural language processing. The primary programming language used in the package is Python. I think the following are good candidates (in no particular order): |
👋 @KonradHoeffner @brunaw @elektrobohemian would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The submission under consideration is DeBIR: A Python Package for Dense Bi-Encoder Information Retrieval, a Python package for information retrieval and natural language processing. The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. You can learn more about the process in these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html Based on your experience, we think you might be able to provide a great review of this submission. Please let me know if you think you can help us out! Many thanks |
@arfon: thanks for the invitation, I accept it! |
Wonderful. Thank you @KonradHoeffner! I'll go ahead and add you as a reviewer and start the review now. @Ayuei – I will look for a second reviewer once @KonradHoeffner has got started. |
@editorialbot add @KonradHoeffner as reviewer |
@KonradHoeffner added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #5017. |
Submitting author: @Ayuei (Vincent Nguyen)
Repository: https://github.com/Ayuei/DeBEIR
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper
Version: v0.0.1
Editor: @arfon
Reviewers: @KonradHoeffner
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Ayuei. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@Ayuei if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: