New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: py-sc-fermi: self-consistent Fermi energies and defect concentrations from electronic structure calculations #4925
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
Wordcount for |
|
@openjournals/bcm-eics, this is very much in my wheelhouse and I have another manuscript about to finish, so I'd be happy to edit this one! |
@rkurchin fantastic. Yes I'll assign you now. |
@editorialbot assign @rkurchin as editor |
Assigned! @rkurchin is now the editor |
👋 @xwang862 and @JackTyson, would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
Thanks for inviting. Unfortunately I won't have time to review it at this moment. I would recommend my colleague @hongzhouye, who is an expert in electronic structure theory and materials modeling. |
No problem, @xwang862, thanks for letting me know. @hongzhouye, if you're available, we'd be happy to have you as a reviewer! |
👋 @agoyal06, hope your new job is treating you well! Would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
Hi Rachel,
Thank you for the invitation! Yes, I am interested in reviewing it if it's
still available.
Since I'm new to this, is there a guideline for reviewers? (I found a
checklist <https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_checklist.html> here
which looks very useful; just in case there are more specific ones). And
roughly
by when do you want my comments? Thanks!
Best,
Hong-Zhou
…On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 9:14 AM Rachel Kurchin ***@***.***> wrote:
No problem, @xwang862 <https://github.com/xwang862>, thanks for letting
me know. @hongzhouye <https://github.com/hongzhouye>, if you're
available, we'd be happy to have you as a reviewer!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4925 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC5HQKOOKECTTYSDKGIKR5LWIY4THANCNFSM6AAAAAAR5QWKZ4>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
@editorialbot add @hongzhouye as reviewer @hongzhouye, thanks! Once we finalize the list of reviewers, a new issue will be opened ([REVIEW] instead of [PRE REVIEW]) and there will be instructions for generating and working through your checklist. At that point, I can also answer any other questions you have. @agoyal06, ideally within a month or so if possible, would that be okay? |
@hongzhouye added to the reviewers list! |
Thank you so much!
…On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 10:55 AM Rachel Kurchin ***@***.***> wrote:
@editorialbot <https://github.com/editorialbot> add @hongzhouye
<https://github.com/hongzhouye> as reviewer
@hongzhouye <https://github.com/hongzhouye>, thanks! Once we finalize the
list of reviewers, a new issue will be opened ([REVIEW] instead of [PRE
REVIEW]) and there will be instructions for generating and working through
your checklist. At that point, I can also answer any other questions you
have.
@agoyal06 <https://github.com/agoyal06>, ideally within a month or so if
possible, would that be okay?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4925 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC5HQKOHEZURPQSBHJXXQUTWJOLNHANCNFSM6AAAAAAR5QWKZ4>
.
You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
@editorialbot add @agoyal06 as reviewer |
@agoyal06 added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #4962. |
Submitting author: @alexsquires (Alexander G. Squires)
Repository: https://github.com/bjmorgan/py-sc-fermi
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 0.3.1
Editor: @rkurchin
Reviewers: @hongzhouye, @agoyal06
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @alexsquires. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@alexsquires if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: