[PRE REVIEW]: Zoomerjoin: Superlatively Fast Fuzzy-Joins

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @beniaminogreen (Beniamino Green)
Repository: https://github.com/beniaminogreen/zoomerjoin
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss
Version: 0.1.0
Editor: @samhforbes
Reviewers: @cjbarrie, @wincowgerDEV
Managing EiC: Olivia Guest

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b68ba4bfbce52e56585aea54a5bcba54"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b68ba4bfbce52e56585aea54a5bcba54/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b68ba4bfbce52e56585aea54a5bcba54/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b68ba4bfbce52e56585aea54a5bcba54)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @beniaminogreen. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The AEiC suggestion for the handling editor is @KristinaRiemer.

@beniaminogreen if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.20 s (223.9 files/s, 25178.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown                         6            230              0            922
HTML                             1             10              2            715
R                               18            189            784            706
Rust                             6            125              9            479
JSON                             1              0              0            189
YAML                             6             35             12            183
TeX                              1              0              0            134
Rmd                              3             67            174             55
TOML                             1              2              0             19
C                                1              2              2              4
Bourne Shell                     1              1              8              2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            45            661            991           3408
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1469

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1109/sequen.1997.666900 is OK
- 10.1017/CBO9781139924801 is OK
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz354 is OK
- 10.1145/997817.997857 is OK
- 10.1017/pan.2021.38 is OK
- 10.32614/RJ-2014-011 is OK
- 10.2139/ssrn.3214172 is OK
- 10.1080/01621459.1969.10501049 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[beniaminogreen]

Thanks! Looking at the list of reviewers I would suggest lmullen, as he has written a package (textreuse) that also uses Locality-Sensitive Hashing which inspired me to make this package. Beyond this no real opinions, although I think pmyteh, cjbarrie, and justinchuntngho might be able to supply good reviews.

[beniaminogreen]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[beniaminogreen]

Hi @oliviaguest , just writing to ask if you can confirm whether I have managed to submit all of the materials necessary for a pre-review. Thanks for your time, and please don't hesitate to let me know if there are any other materials that will help you in considering my submission.

Best,
Ben

[oliviaguest]

@samhforbes do you have capacity for this? ☺️

[oliviaguest]

@beniaminogreen yes, sorry... summer is a slow period... 😅

[samhforbes]

@oliviaguest I'm a little over capacity right now, but this looks interesting and I'd be happy to pick it up in a couple of weeks if there's nobody else available.

[oliviaguest]

@samhforbes summer is very slow, so I suspect this is fine. Thank you! 🌈

[samhforbes]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @samhforbes is now the editor

[samhforbes]

👋 @lmullen, @cjbarrie would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[cjbarrie]

Happy to do this!

[lmullen]

@samhforbes Apologies, but I can't take this one on.

[samhforbes]

@editorialbot add @cjbarrie as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@cjbarrie added to the reviewers list!

[samhforbes]

👋 @wincowgerDEV @simonpcouch would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[wincowgerDEV]

Hey @samhforbes, thanks for the invite, currently building a lot of R packages and this is right up my ally, count me in!

[samhforbes]

@editorialbot add @wincowgerDEV as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@wincowgerDEV added to the reviewers list!

[simonpcouch]

I'm unfortunately unable to make this review happen at the moment. Best of luck!

[samhforbes]

Great @beniaminogreen I am going to start the review thread now. This one will be closed and we can begin in the new thread.

[samhforbes]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #5693.