[PRE REVIEW]: EdSurvey: an R package to analyze Large-scale educational assessments data

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @pdbailey0 (Paul Bailey)
Repository: https://github.com/American-Institutes-for-Research/EdSurvey/
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss
Version: 4.0.1
Editor: @oliviaguest
Reviewers: @wjakethompson, @jrosen48
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/9c1e70616ca856cde31b09804e5df374"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/9c1e70616ca856cde31b09804e5df374/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/9c1e70616ca856cde31b09804e5df374/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/9c1e70616ca856cde31b09804e5df374)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @pdbailey0. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@pdbailey0 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.32 s (1062.2 files/s, 252968.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                              215           5042           8657          35345
HTML                           102           4135            311          14426
JavaScript                       4           2099           1928           7019
XML                              1              0              0            306
Markdown                         4             57              0            176
TeX                              1              7              0             67
YAML                             3              3              4             27
SVG                              1              0              1             11
Rmd                              2             63             81              9
CSS                              1              0              5              1
JSON                             1              0              0              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           335          11406          10987          57388
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1081

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.18637/jss.v081.i07 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[pdbailey0]

Thanks! I would recommend lebebr01 (reviewer 151), wjakethompson (reviewer 374). Thanks for asking!

If you want more, I can also recommend a reviewer who is not on the list but don't want to post their contact info to a public issue. Do they have to volunteer before I can do that?

[oliviaguest]

@marcosvital do you have capacity for this? 😊

[pdbailey0]

Maybe I'm not supposed to understand but I'm confused as to where this review is. Again, I'm happy to suggest additional reviewers who are not currently in the JOSS volunteer list, but I don't know how.

[danielskatz]

@pdbailey0 - the first step is for the track editor to find an editor. Then that editor will find reviewers, and once they do so, will start the review. You can suggest reviewers here in a comment at any time, but be aware that until there is an editor, the suggestions won't be acted upon.

[danielskatz]

For a high-level overview of the process, see https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2018.03221930

[danielskatz]

though as I look at that figure, it's a bit out of date - I think there's a newer one somewhere...

[danielskatz]

yes, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5147773.v2 is more up-to-date

[pdbailey0]

That later link is helpful. I think this article is here:

[danielskatz]

right

[oliviaguest]

@pdbailey0 yes, indeed and thanks to @danielskatz for explaining. Summer is very slow; apologies.

[oliviaguest]

I can't find anybody more suited than me (and I was moving house/on holiday), so I am happy to just take this over. 😊

[oliviaguest]

Would any of you @lebebr01 @wjakethompson @kalendar be happy to review this paper for JOSS?

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot assign @oliviaguest as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @oliviaguest is now the editor

[wjakethompson]

I'd be happy to review.

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot add @wjakethompson as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@wjakethompson added to the reviewers list!

[oliviaguest]

@jrosen48 do you want to review this? We need one more. 😊

[jrosen48]

Could I have six weeks! I am on parental leave for another four weeks. Thank you!

…

-- Joshua M. Rosenberg, Ph.D. Associate Professor, STEM Education Coordinator, Educational Data Science Graduate Certificate Program The University of Tennessee, Knoxville https://joshuamrosenberg<https://joshuamrosenberg.com/> PI, CAREER: Creatively Reimagining Engagements with Data in Biology Learning Environments (NSF Grant No. 2239152) Associate Editor, Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education

________________________________ From: Olivia Guest ***@***.***> Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2023 8:25:34 AM To: openjournals/joss-reviews ***@***.***> Cc: Rosenberg, Joshua ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: EdSurvey: an R package to analyze Large-scale educational assessments data (Issue #5579) @jrosen48<https://github.com/jrosen48> do you want to review this? We need one more. 😊 — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#5579 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABDCD5RMXM7BVKC5ZN7QLVTXZG4L5ANCNFSM6AAAAAAZO3U6FI>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[oliviaguest]

@jrosen48 sure; understandable!

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot add @jrosen48 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@jrosen48 added to the reviewers list!

[oliviaguest]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #5835.

[oliviaguest]

👋 @pdbailey0, @wjakethompson, @jrosen48 go to #5835 to proceed with the review.