[PRE REVIEW]: SPICY: A python toolbox for meshless assimilation from image velocimetry using radial basis functions

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @mendezVKI (Miguel Alfonso Mendez)
Repository: https://github.com/mendezVKI/SPICY_VKI
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @philipcardiff
Reviewers: @nolankucd, @MatthewFlamm, @ctdegroot
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ca453152e765cab3bab8a8b57f6aa400"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ca453152e765cab3bab8a8b57f6aa400/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ca453152e765cab3bab8a8b57f6aa400/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ca453152e765cab3bab8a8b57f6aa400)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mendezVKI. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@mendezVKI if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=1.52 s (52.0 files/s, 89906.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript                      24          10477          24993          76426
HTML                            15            911             38           6885
Python                           5            811           2072           3048
SVG                              1              0              0           2671
CSS                              9            341            300           2503
Jupyter Notebook                 8              0           3411           1127
YAML                             2             26             43            205
reStructuredText                10             59             34             98
TeX                              1              8              0             81
Markdown                         2             35              0             59
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            79          12680          30899          93138
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1088/1361-6501/ac70a9 is OK
- 10.1017/s0962492914000130 is OK
- 10.1007/s00348-016-2133-9 is OK
- 10.1007/s00348-021-03172-0 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.18409/ispiv.v1i1.198 may be a valid DOI for title: Main results of the first Data Assimilation Challenge

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taml.2020.01.039 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 748

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot invite @philipcardiff as editor

Hi @philipcardiff, could you edit this submission instead?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[philipcardiff]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @philipcardiff is now the editor

[philipcardiff]

Hi @mendezVKI, see a few minor English edits at mendezVKI/SPICY_VKI#1, which you may like to merge.

We will use this pre-review issue to find reviewers. Feel free to suggest suitable reviewers.

[philipcardiff]

Hi @nolankucd, would you be interested in reviewing this submission?

The submission under consideration is SPICY: A python toolbox for meshless assimilation from image velocimetry using radial basis functions (https://github.com/mendezVKI/SPICY_VKI).

If you are unfamiliar with JOSS, the review process is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and encourages author-reviewer-editor conversations. You can have a look at our review criteria and review checklist to get an idea of what is expected.

Philip

[nolankucd]

Dear Philip, This sounds very interesting. I am happy to review. Kevin

…

On 1 Aug 2023, at 13:26, Philip Cardiff ***@***.***> wrote: Hi @nolankucd <https://github.com/nolankucd>, would you be interested in reviewing this submission? The submission under consideration is SPICY: A python toolbox for meshless assimilation from image velocimetry using radial basis functions (https://github.com/mendezVKI/SPICY_VKI <https://github.com/mendezVKI/SPICY_VKI>). If you are unfamiliar with JOSS, the review process is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and encourages author-reviewer-editor conversations. You can have a look at our review criteria <https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html> and review checklist <https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_checklist.html> to get an idea of what is expected. Philip — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#5699 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL5J3DIQYVPB3JXXVDYCRMDXTDYWZANCNFSM6AAAAAA22LQQMM>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

[mendezVKI]

Hello Philip,

Thank you for handling my submission. I am completely new to JOSS and its review process, so I might mess up in various ways.

I agree with all your English edits, of course. As for the reviewers, using the review checklist with (1) Python programming language, (2) Physics and Engineering as areas of expertise and (3) machine learning + fluid dynamics I get :

Sven Berger
akaptano

Miguel

[philipcardiff]

@editorialbot add @nolankucd as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@nolankucd added to the reviewers list!

[philipcardiff]

Dear Philip, This sounds very interesting. I am happy to review. Kevin
…

Great, thanks Kevin!

[philipcardiff]

Hello @akaptano, is this submission something you would be interested in reviewing?

[philipcardiff]

Hi @ctdegroot, would you be interested in reviewing this submission?

The submission under consideration is SPICY: A python toolbox for meshless assimilation from image velocimetry using radial basis functions (https://github.com/mendezVKI/SPICY_VKI).

[philipcardiff]

Hi @MatthewFlamm, would you be interested in reviewing this submission?

The submission under consideration is SPICY: A python toolbox for meshless assimilation from image velocimetry using radial basis functions (https://github.com/mendezVKI/SPICY_VKI).

[MatthewFlamm]

I can review this. What is the general timeline for review?

[philipcardiff]

Thanks, @MatthewFlamm.

Typically, you would post your initial comments within a few weeks, but longer is fine, too, if you are confident you can allocate the time.

For convenience, you can have a look at our review criteria and review checklist.

[philipcardiff]

@editorialbot add @MatthewFlamm as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@MatthewFlamm added to the reviewers list!

[ctdegroot]

Yes, I would be happy to review this.

[philipcardiff]

Yes, I would be happy to review this.

Great, thanks Chris!

[philipcardiff]

@editorialbot add @ctdegroot as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@ctdegroot added to the reviewers list!

[philipcardiff]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #5749.

[philipcardiff]

Hi all, we can continue at the review issue #5749.