[PRE REVIEW]: SysIdentPyGUI: A Graphical User Interface for System Identification using NARMAX models

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @jceneziojr (Júlio César Enezio Júnior)
Repository: https://github.com/jceneziojr/sysidentpygui/
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.1.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/993ae4dfb6c5052877c20a17e2ec7974"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/993ae4dfb6c5052877c20a17e2ec7974/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/993ae4dfb6c5052877c20a17e2ec7974/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/993ae4dfb6c5052877c20a17e2ec7974)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @jceneziojr. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@jceneziojr if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.03 s (856.4 files/s, 82734.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           8            173             40           1356
Markdown                         9            162              0            284
TeX                              1              8              0             93
YAML                             2              6              4             54
CSS                              1              5              3             15
Dockerfile                       1              5              0              8
JSON                             1              0              0              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            23            359             47           1816
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/0005-1098(89)90019-8 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.02384 is OK
- 10.1016/b978-0-12-811788-0.00008-1 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106835 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.417 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.12.031 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.100495 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 966

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot query scope

[editorialbot]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[kyleniemeyer]

Hello @jceneziojr, the JOSS editorial board is going to review your submission to see if it is in scope for us. Generally, GUIs / web apps for a separate tool are not in scope, particularly in this case when the underlying software package has already been published by JOSS (SysIdentPy: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.02384). We will get back to you within a week or so.

[kyleniemeyer]

Hello @jceneziojr, unfortunately upon review the JOSS editorial board has found that your submission is outside our scope, since it implements a GUI for other software that has already been published by JOSS.

We encourage you to look at other options for archiving your software, such as using Zenodo to create a permanent archive and DOI for your software. This DOI can then be used by others to cite your work.

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot reject

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.