New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: ParticleTracking: A GUI and library for particle tracking on stereo camera images #5827
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
Wordcount for |
|
@a-niem – thanks for your submission to JOSS. It looks like there's an issue with the formatting of your paper, see this error:
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
@a-niem It seems like the paper is ok now. Thank you for your submission to JOSS. We are currently facing a backlog of submissions in this track. Can you please follow up by looking at the list of editors to help me identify an editor that closely matches the topic of your submission? When you reach this page, please scroll down to Topic Editors. Please note that I am not asking you to suggest reviewers at this stage. Please simply list the GitHub IDs of prospective topic editors without using the @. Please reply to this thread by listing up to three GitHub IDs only (one per line). |
@editorialbot invite @danasolav as editor |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Sorry, I'm too busy at the moment to take this one. |
@editorialbot assign @jgostick as editor |
Assigned! @jgostick is now the editor |
Hey @a-niem, I'll be the topical editor on this one. I'm familiar with 2D and 3D image processing, but not much on particle tracking. I think I can manage though. First thing: can you take a look through this list of people and suggest some potential reviewers? |
Hi @jgostick. Here's a list of potentially suitable reviewers:
|
Thank you, I'll begin reaching out. |
I'm an getting 100% crickets on my requests to review so far, sorry for the delay. I'll send out a new round of invitations. |
@editorialbot add @mhubii as reviewer |
@mhubii added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot invite @aquilesC as reviewer |
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
|
It seems that editorialbot does not have a command for 'inviting' reviewers', only adding them...so @aquilesC, please consider yourself officially invited. |
I would like to review this submission. |
Excellent, thank you! This means we have our quota of reviewers and can begin! |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #5986. |
Submitting author: @a-niem (Adrian Niemann)
Repository: https://github.com/ANP-Granular/ParticleTracking
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss_paper
Version: v0.6.0
Editor: @jgostick
Reviewers: @mhubii
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @a-niem. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@a-niem if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: