[PRE REVIEW]: SCAS dashboard: A tool to intuitively and interactively analyze Slurm cluster usage

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @wathom (Thomas W.)
Repository: https://github.com/Bioinformatics-Munich/scas_dashboard
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @danielskatz
Reviewers: @aturner-epcc, @apjez, @verolero86
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c87682f0b4f5fa6e7615d5a5b16370f0"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c87682f0b4f5fa6e7615d5a5b16370f0/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c87682f0b4f5fa6e7615d5a5b16370f0/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c87682f0b4f5fa6e7615d5a5b16370f0)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @wathom. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@wathom if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=2.30 s (14.8 files/s, 1941.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                                5            437            272           1429
Python                          13            280            349           1037
Markdown                         4             59              0            300
YAML                             3              7              8            126
TeX                              1              4              0             45
Dockerfile                       3             22             19             42
CSS                              1              3              0             14
Bourne Shell                     3              1              2             10
JSON                             1              0              0              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            34            813            650           3004
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1500

[editorialbot]

Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[danielskatz]

👋 @wathom - note that your paper does not compile. Please follow the example paper and note that you can click on the error above to find out more about it. Please feel free to use the command @editorialbot generate pdf after making changes to the .md file. editorialbot commands need to be the first entry in a new comment. Once your paper compiles, please use the command @editorialbot check references to check the references, and if there are any errors, fix them, then use the same command again to verify that they are fixed.

See the .md file in GitHub:

[danielskatz]

Additionally, your paper is now written as an operations paper, with this software being described as supporting operations. JOSS is for research software. I can easily imagine research applications for this software, and it would be helpful if you could add a bit of research uses of the software (in computer science, for example) to the statement of need.

[wathom]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

DASF: A data analytics software framework for distributed environments
Submitting author: @d-eggert
Handling editor: @martinfleis (Active)
Reviewers: @cjwu, @pritchardn
Similarity score: 0.8096

CSaransh : Software Suite to Study Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Collision Cascades
Submitting author: @haptork
Handling editor: @katyhuff (Retired)
Reviewers: @jmborr, @arose
Similarity score: 0.8094

Sapsan: Framework for Supernovae Turbulence Modeling with Machine Learning
Submitting author: @pikarpov-lanl
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @kburns, @milescranmer
Similarity score: 0.8083

Open OnDemand: A web-based client portal for HPC centers
Submitting author: @ericfranz
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @marpierc, @smgallo
Similarity score: 0.8050

strucscan: A lightweight Python-based framework for high-throughput material simulation
Submitting author: @thohamm
Handling editor: @ppxasjsm (Active)
Reviewers: @mturiansky, @wcwitt
Similarity score: 0.8025

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[wathom]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1007/10968987_3 may be a valid DOI for title: SLURM: Simple Linux Utility for Resource Management

INVALID DOIs

- None

[wathom]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[wathom]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

DASF: A data analytics software framework for distributed environments
Submitting author: @d-eggert
Handling editor: @martinfleis (Active)
Reviewers: @cjwu, @pritchardn
Similarity score: 0.8096

CSaransh : Software Suite to Study Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Collision Cascades
Submitting author: @haptork
Handling editor: @katyhuff (Retired)
Reviewers: @jmborr, @arose
Similarity score: 0.8094

Sapsan: Framework for Supernovae Turbulence Modeling with Machine Learning
Submitting author: @pikarpov-lanl
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @kburns, @milescranmer
Similarity score: 0.8083

Open OnDemand: A web-based client portal for HPC centers
Submitting author: @ericfranz
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @marpierc, @smgallo
Similarity score: 0.8050

strucscan: A lightweight Python-based framework for high-throughput material simulation
Submitting author: @thohamm
Handling editor: @ppxasjsm (Active)
Reviewers: @mturiansky, @wcwitt
Similarity score: 0.8025

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/10968987_3 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @danielskatz is now the editor

[danielskatz]

👋 @wathom - if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

[danielskatz]

Thanks to @aturner-epcc for volunteering to review - I'll add you now, and once we get one or two more reviewers, we'll start the review

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot add @aturner-epcc as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@aturner-epcc added to the reviewers list!

[danielskatz]

Thanks to @apjez for volunteering to review - I'll add you now, and once we get one more reviewers, we'll start the review

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot add @apjez as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@apjez added to the reviewers list!

[danielskatz]

Thanks to @verolero86 for volunteering to review - I'll add you now, and start the review

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot add @verolero86 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@verolero86 added to the reviewers list!

[danielskatz]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6017.