New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: GATree: Evolutionary decision tree classifier in Python #6456
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: ✅ License found: |
@editorialbot query scope @lahovniktadej – due to the relatively small size of this code, the editors will now discuss if it meets the substantial scholarly effort criterion for review by JOSS. We should get back to you sometime next week. If you want to fix the DOIs (noting that @editorialbot's suggestions are not always right), you can, then use the following commands (one at a time, as the first line of a new comment) to regenerate the PDF and check the references. @editorialbot generate pdf |
Submission flagged for editorial review. |
@editorialbot generate pdf |
@editorialbot check references |
|
@lahovniktadej – this submission has passed the scope review stage, even though there are some concerns about the size/level of effort associated with this package. At this point I'm putting it into the backlog of submissions that are awaiting an editor to be assigned. This will likely take a few weeks as we have a number of submissions in the queue ahead of this one. Thanks in advance for your patience! |
@editorialbot invite @kellyrowland as editor 👋 @kellyrowland – would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS? |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
hi @arfon I can take this on 👍 |
@editorialbot assign @kellyrowland as editor |
Assigned! @kellyrowland is now the editor |
hi @TimKam @FlyingPumba 👋 would you be interested in and available for reviewing this JOSS submission? |
Hi @kellyrowland thanks for considering me for review of this submission! I'm interested. What is the timeline for the review? |
@FlyingPumba thanks for your interest - ideally we wrap the reviews up in 6 weeks or so, but the process is flexible around the reviewers' and authors' schedules. |
@kellyrowland great! In that case I'll gladly accept to review the submission. |
thanks! I'll add you as a reviewer here and will start the review process once we have a second reviewer lined up as well. |
@editorialbot add @FlyingPumba to reviewers |
@FlyingPumba added to the reviewers list! |
hi @lwu9 @TahiriNadia 👋 would either of you be interested in and available for reviewing this JOSS submission? |
Hi,
I don't have enough bandwidth till May 23rd. If you still need people to
review at that time, I'm happy to help!
Best,
Lili
…On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 12:20, Kelly L. Rowland ***@***.***> wrote:
hi @lwu9 <https://github.com/lwu9> @TahiriNadia
<https://github.com/TahiriNadia> 👋 would either of you be interested in
and available for reviewing this JOSS submission?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#6456 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG4SWUKXFW53MTLX5OOHP53Y7ZXOHAVCNFSM6AAAAABEN52ZGWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAOBTGE2TKOBVHE>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Sure, I am happy to help. Thanks!
…On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 2:39 PM Kelly L. Rowland ***@***.***> wrote:
hello @mkerin <https://github.com/mkerin> @WeakCha
<https://github.com/WeakCha> 👋 would either of you be interested in and
available for reviewing this JOSS submission?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#6456 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALQQQR6S27PKIFZMZ3XJWATZCECGNAVCNFSM6AAAAABEN52ZGWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMBYGU2TCMZZG4>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
@editorialbot add @WeakCha to reviewers |
@WeakCha added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #6748. |
Submitting author: @lahovniktadej (Tadej Lahovnik)
Repository: https://github.com/lahovniktadej/gatree
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 0.1.4
Editor: @kellyrowland
Reviewers: @FlyingPumba, @WeakCha
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @lahovniktadej. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@lahovniktadej if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: