-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REVIEW]: PyPEEC: A 3D Quasi-Magnetostatic Solver using an FFT-Accelerated PEEC Method with Voxelization #6644
Comments
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: 🔴 Failed to discover a valid open source license |
|
Hi, I just wanted to ask if there is any progress for the review. The issue about the installation of PyPEEC has been solved (see otvam/pypeec#5). |
Hi @otvam, thanks. The review is more or less stalled du to my professional duties, my apologies. I'll try to catch up as soon as possible. To my knowledge, no another reviewer been found, right ? |
Review checklist for @thelferConflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
I am still actively looking for another reviewer - had some no -replies but will keep looking |
@likeajumprope On my side, professional duties did not allow me to complete the review so far. First impressions on the paper and the project are good (although this is by no way my scientific field of expertise, so I can hardly judge fairly), I feel a bit ashamed. |
No problem at all, @thelfer. The effort is very much appreciated regardless, so don't worry! |
@likeajumprope Issues related to the review:
|
Submitting author: @otvam (Thomas Guillod)
Repository: https://github.com/otvam/pypeec
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper_joss
Version: v4.8.0
Editor: @likeajumprope
Reviewers: @thelfer
Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@thelfer, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review.
First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @likeajumprope know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
📝 Checklist for @thelfer
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: