New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REVIEW]: cuallee: A python package for data quality checks across multiple DataFrame APIs #6684
Comments
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: ✅ License found: |
@devarops, @FlorianK13 - Dear reviewers, you can start with creating your task lists. In that list, there are several tasks. Whenever you perform a task, you can check on the corresponding checkbox. Since the review process of JOSS is interactive, you can always interact with the author, the other reviewers, and the editor during the process. You can open issues and pull requests in the target repo. Please mention the url of this page in there so we can keep tracking what is going on out of our world. Please create your tasklist by typing
Thank you in advance. |
Review checklist for @devaropsConflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
NotesInstallation
|
Review checklist for @FlorianK13Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
|
Submitting author: @canimus (Herminio Vazquez)
Repository: https://github.com/canimus/cuallee
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main
Version: v0.8.8
Editor: @jbytecode
Reviewers: @devarops, @FlorianK13
Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@devarops & @FlorianK13, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review.
First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @jbytecode know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
📝 Checklist for @devarops
📝 Checklist for @FlorianK13
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: