[PRE REVIEW]: VIVO: a system for research discovery

[whedon]

Submitting author: @mconlon17 (Michael Conlon)
Repository: https://github.com/vivo-project/VIVO
Version: v1.10.0
Editor: @jasonclark
Reviewers: @sonal-raj

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mconlon17. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@mconlon17 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @jasonclark it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper 🎉

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

PDF failed to compile for issue #943 with the following error:

/app/vendor/ruby-2.3.4/lib/ruby/2.3.0/psych.rb:379:in parse': (tmp/943/paper/paper.md): did not find expected key while parsing a block mapping at line 2 column 1 (Psych::SyntaxError) from /app/vendor/ruby-2.3.4/lib/ruby/2.3.0/psych.rb:379:in parse_stream'
from /app/vendor/ruby-2.3.4/lib/ruby/2.3.0/psych.rb:327:in parse' from /app/vendor/ruby-2.3.4/lib/ruby/2.3.0/psych.rb:254:in load'
from /app/vendor/ruby-2.3.4/lib/ruby/2.3.0/psych.rb:475:in block in load_file' from /app/vendor/ruby-2.3.4/lib/ruby/2.3.0/psych.rb:474:in open'
from /app/vendor/ruby-2.3.4/lib/ruby/2.3.0/psych.rb:474:in load_file' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bundler/gems/whedon-2caaf5cba519/lib/whedon.rb:68:in initialize'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bundler/gems/whedon-2caaf5cba519/lib/whedon/processor.rb:32:in new' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bundler/gems/whedon-2caaf5cba519/lib/whedon/processor.rb:32:in set_paper'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bundler/gems/whedon-2caaf5cba519/bin/whedon:37:in prepare' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/command.rb:27:in run'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/invocation.rb:126:in invoke_command' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor.rb:387:in dispatch'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/base.rb:466:in start' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bundler/gems/whedon-2caaf5cba519/bin/whedon:99:in <top (required)>'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bin/whedon:22:in load' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bin/whedon:22:in

'

[arfon]

👋 @jasonclark - the submitting authors suggested you as the handling editor.

[jasonclark]

@arfon Yes, I can edit this submission.
@mconlon17 Thanks for the submission. The software has a general description, a BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License, you are a recognized contributor on the project, and it is scoped correctly as research software (E.g., software for a research application). These are a few of my pre-review checks. Our next step is to find a reviewer.

[jasonclark]

@jaynanavati Would you be available to review the VIVO software? We would be looking for a review in the next few weeks. Thanks for considering. cc @mconlon17

[jasonclark]

@gabrielspadon Would you be available to review the VIVO software? We would be looking for a review in the next few weeks. Thanks for considering. cc @mconlon17

[jaynanavati]

I am so sorry. I am busy with other pre-planned things. So, I am not available.

…

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 11:22 AM Jason A. Clark ***@***.***> wrote: @gabrielspadon <https://github.com/gabrielspadon> Would you be available to review the VIVO software? We would be looking for a review in the next few weeks. Thanks for considering. cc @mconlon17 <https://github.com/mconlon17> — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#943 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/Amk3L8dMwPVUOA4Aabjril6X1gx7UiW9ks5uhUacgaJpZM4WpBrV> .

[jasonclark]

@jaynanavati No worries. Thanks for the note.

[jasonclark]

@corybrunson Would you be available to review the VIVO software? We would be looking for a review in the next few weeks. Thanks for considering. cc @mconlon17

[corybrunson]

@jasonclark i'm sorry, i don't think i'll be able to right now.

[jasonclark]

@semacu Would you be available to review the VIVO software? We would be looking for a review in the next few weeks. Thanks for considering. cc @mconlon17 @arfon

[jasonclark]

@sonal-raj We could really use a reviewer on this software. Thought your experience with Graphs and Graph Databases would be super useful here. Would you be available to review the VIVO software? We would be looking for a review in the next few weeks. Thanks for considering. cc @mconlon17 @arfon

[semacu]

Thanks for letting me know, I am afraid I won't have time to review this in detail now as the few weeks leading to Christmas are always hectic.

[sonal-raj]

@sonal-raj We could really use a reviewer on this software. Thought your experience with Graphs and Graph Databases would be super useful here. Would you be available to review the VIVO software? We would be looking for a review in the next few weeks. Thanks for considering. cc @mconlon17 @arfon

@jasonclark Thanks for the request. I like the idea of this software and would love to help review it. Only constraint is my schedule is packed till 18th of Dec, but I am available post that. Depending on the urgency, if the time looks fine to you, I can definitely help review VIVO. Do let me know.

[jasonclark]

@sonal-raj That timeline still works for us. Thanks for offering your expertise. I'll set up the review process and you can pick it up after December 18. cc @mconlon17 @arfon

[sonal-raj]

@jasonclark Sounds Good!

[arfon]

@jasonclark - are we good to set up the main review at this stage or are you looking for a second reviewer?

[jasonclark]

Was hoping to keep @sonal-raj on this review after the holidays. I'm going to set up review now. @sonal-raj if you have questions or limited availability, let me know. If you could look at reviewing in the next couple of weeks, that would be great.

[jasonclark]

@sonal-raj One more check: Do you have time for this review?

[sonal-raj]

@jasonclark Apologies, but I am really swamped with a conference for next couple of weeks. I thought we were taking this up in Dec? Anyways, happy to take this up starting the month end, if that is not too late. Let me know otherwise!

[jasonclark]

@sonal-raj That is fine. I'm happy to have you as a reviewer and start the process. Later this month works. Apologies for missing the assignment over the holiday. Going to assign you as a reviewer and open it for editing. You can pick up when you are able. If you have questions, just reach out.

[jasonclark]

@whedon assign @sonal-raj as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @sonal-raj

[jasonclark]

@whedon start review magic-word=bananas

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #1182. Feel free to close this issue now!