Mark abstract method as function for JSDoc to pick it up #2191
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This leaves aside the question whether getImage needs to be defined as abstract method in a base class that does not know about images, but at least it makes the documentation appear correctly in ol.tile.Image.
|
+1 |
ahocevar
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 12, 2014
Mark abstract method as function for JSDoc to pick it up
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This leaves aside the question whether getImage needs to be
defined as abstract method in a base class that does not know
about images, but at least it makes the documentation appear
correctly in ol.tile.Image.