-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Alex/cos 3288 website not populating on prospects #7298
Alex/cos 3288 website not populating on prospects #7298
Conversation
WalkthroughThe update involves modifying the parameter of the Changes
Poem
Tip New Features and ImprovementsReview SettingsIntroduced new personality profiles for code reviews. Users can now select between "Chill" and "Assertive" review tones to tailor feedback styles according to their preferences. The "Assertive" profile posts more comments and nitpicks the code more aggressively, while the "Chill" profile is more relaxed and posts fewer comments. AST-based InstructionsCodeRabbit offers customizing reviews based on the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) pattern matching. Read more about AST-based instructions in the documentation. Community-driven AST-based RulesWe are kicking off a community-driven initiative to create and share AST-based rules. Users can now contribute their AST-based rules to detect security vulnerabilities, code smells, and anti-patterns. Please see the ast-grep-essentials repository for more information. New Static Analysis ToolsWe are continually expanding our support for static analysis tools. We have added support for Tone SettingsUsers can now customize CodeRabbit to review code in the style of their favorite characters or personalities. Here are some of our favorite examples:
Revamped Settings PageWe have redesigned the settings page for a more intuitive layout, enabling users to find and adjust settings quickly. This change was long overdue; it not only improves the user experience but also allows our development team to add more settings in the future with ease. Going forward, the changes to Miscellaneous
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
783b9c3
to
b7459d7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/server/events-processing-platform-subscribers/subscriptions/organization/organization_event_handler.go (5 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
packages/server/events-processing-platform-subscribers/subscriptions/organization/organization_event_handler.go (3)
8-8
: Import ofneo4jEntity
has been added to support the new parameter type inupdateOrganizationFromBrandfetch
.
474-477
: The update to populate theWebsite
field if it is empty aligns with the PR objective to ensure websites are populating on prospects. Good implementation.
376-376
: The functionupdateOrganizationFromBrandfetch
now takes anOrganizationEntity
instead of anorganizationId
. Ensure all calls to this function are updated to pass the correct type.Verification successful
The function
updateOrganizationFromBrandfetch
now takes anOrganizationEntity
instead of anorganizationId
. All occurrences of this function in the codebase match the new signature, confirming that the function calls have been updated correctly.
packages/server/events-processing-platform-subscribers/subscriptions/organization/organization_event_handler.go: h.updateOrganizationFromBrandfetch(ctx, tenant, domain, *organizationEntity, brandfetchResponse)
packages/server/events-processing-platform-subscribers/subscriptions/organization/organization_event_handler.go: func (h *organizationEventHandler) updateOrganizationFromBrandfetch(ctx context.Context, tenant, domain string, organizationEntity neo4jEntity.OrganizationEntity, brandfetch BrandfetchResponse) {
packages/server/events-processing-platform-subscribers/subscriptions/organization/organization_event_handler.go: span, ctx := opentracing.StartSpanFromContext(ctx, "OrganizationEventHandler.updateOrganizationFromBrandfetch")
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `updateOrganizationFromBrandfetch` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go $'updateOrganizationFromBrandfetch'Length of output: 791
span, ctx := opentracing.StartSpanFromContext(ctx, "OrganizationEventHandler.updateOrganizationFromBrandfetch") | ||
defer span.Finish() | ||
|
||
organizationFieldsMask := make([]organizationpb.OrganizationMaskField, 0) | ||
updateGrpcRequest := organizationpb.UpdateOrganizationGrpcRequest{ | ||
Tenant: tenant, | ||
OrganizationId: organizationId, | ||
OrganizationId: organizationEntity.ID, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The handling of the Employees
field in updateOrganizationFromBrandfetch
is complex due to different possible data types. Consider simplifying this logic or ensuring robust error handling and validation.
- sEmployees, ok := brandfetch.Company.Employees.(string)
- if ok {
- if brandfetch.Company.Employees != "" {
- employees := int64(0)
- if strings.Contains(sEmployees, "-") {
- parts := strings.Split(sEmployees, "-")
- employees, _ = strconv.ParseInt(parts[0], 10, 64)
- } else {
- employees, _ = strconv.ParseInt(sEmployees, 10, 64)
- }
- if employees > 0 {
- organizationFieldsMask = append(organizationFieldsMask, organizationpb.OrganizationMaskField_ORGANIZATION_PROPERTY_EMPLOYEES)
- updateGrpcRequest.Employees = employees
- }
- }
- }
+ // Simplify the handling of Employees field by expecting a single format or performing the conversion earlier in the process.
Also applies to: 474-477
Committable suggestion was skipped due low confidence.
Proposed changes
Changes
What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an
x
in the boxes that applyAdditional context
Summary by CodeRabbit