You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since travis build for mapbox/mapbox-studio-classic keeps failing from 9 months ago, I think there is no evidence that this project is alive/backed by Mapbox.
The latest PR about mapbox-studio-classic is #304 (tiny part of quickstart refactoring #261 )
But since the author stopped working on it for 9 month, and original intend is moving it to Makefile, I think it's OK to just make another tiny commit on master branch.
by the way, it is a little scary that master branch stopped at 👹 666 commits over 2 months. if experienced contributors think it is OK, I will quickly make a simple PR for this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@MartinMikita Thanks for your reply, PR made #506
Removal is simple, but I think more important things is the necessity evaluation for this move.
I don't have any experience about this classic version, but it just annoyed me by failing on it's docker running.
Any Mapbox worker/experienced user here? Do we still need this thing?
@jirik @klokan @MartinMikita @lukasmartinelli
I want to totally remove
mapbox-studio-classic
from openmaptiles.Please give me some feedback! Thanks!
Since travis build for mapbox/mapbox-studio-classic keeps failing from 9 months ago, I think there is no evidence that this project is alive/backed by Mapbox.
ref:
Travis build history: https://travis-ci.org/mapbox/mapbox-studio-classic/builds
related issue : mapbox/mapbox-studio-classic#1581
The latest PR about
mapbox-studio-classic
is #304 (tiny part of quickstart refactoring #261 )But since the author stopped working on it for 9 month, and original intend is moving it to Makefile, I think it's OK to just make another tiny commit on master branch.
by the way, it is a little scary that master branch stopped at 👹 666 commits over 2 months. if experienced contributors think it is OK, I will quickly make a simple PR for this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: