New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement private road tagging #1174
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Results evaluating commit 428abc5 (merged with base fdb9ae5 as 9272346). See run details. PostgreSQL DB size in MB: 2790 ⇒ 2790 (0.0% change)
expand for details...
|
Awesome! Thanks, it looks great! |
TomPohys
approved these changes
Aug 14, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #1066
This PR adds a new field
access
in the transportation layer, which will be set tono
if theaccess
tag is eitherno
orprivate
. Whileprivate
is the more popular value by a 17:1 ratio, I went withno
because it's smaller in the tiles. In addition, the textno
opens up the future possibility of other text-based access values such asdestination
,customers
, orpermit
.The screenshot below shows an example of access tagging for a road on a military base: