document extra values for omero.fs.repo.path_rules (ticket #10822)

[mtbc]

Fixes https://trac.openmicroscopy.org.uk/ome/ticket/10822 in concert with ome/openmicroscopy#1924.
--no-rebase as FS-specific.

[hflynn]

@mtbc can you rebase this to dev_5_0 for review please?

[mtbc]

Should I first wait for review of ome/openmicroscopy#1924 and the subsequent rebase of that? (I don't know when we start reviewing last year's develop PRs; I guess it depends on the urgency. Right now this PR describes code changes that aren't rebased to 5.0.)

[hflynn]

Ah, I think you may need to rebase your code PR too - @sbesson has just given me the impression that we are reviewing dev_5_0 rather than develop until we get 5.0.0 released. But probably best to check with someone.

Unless your code PR is intended for 5.1 rather than 5.0, in which case, ignore my suggestion!

[mtbc]

Ah, I'd assumed that new PRs should be against dev_5_0 but otherwise we'd just do the usual thing of reviewing on the first, whichever it is, and then rebasing to the other. I'll see if devteam has an opinion ...

[mtbc]

Looks like dev_5_1 reviews will start this month. (-: Will certainly rebase this docs PR for you to follow the code.

[mtbc]

This is fine to keep on dev_5_1 only to match the corresponding code PR.

[ximenesuk]

Looks good to merge.