switch source file line breaks to LF #4148
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
"Showing 0 changed files with 0 additions and 0 deletions." when viewing with |
|
As a heads-up, assuming this is going to conflict with the rebase of #4145, can we postpone this cleanup once the MATLAB changes are in? |
|
Rather than check for specific conflicts, have force-pushed away commits that touch any MATLAB file, or any server/blitz Java source file (for @jburel's Javadoc work on |
|
👍 works for me |
sbesson
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2015
switch source file line breaks to LF
This was referenced Sep 18, 2015
rgozim
pushed a commit
to rgozim/openmicroscopy
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2018
switch source file line breaks to LF
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We generally use Unix-style line endings but some files differ. This PR fixes (now, some of) those outliers. No change at all should be observed with OMERO's behavior. See https://github.com/openmicroscopy/openmicroscopy/pull/4148/files?w=1.
--rebased-to #4185