We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As a Advanced User
I want to use traci/sumolib as simulation controller with customised vehicle types
In order to be able to control groups of vehicles simultaneously during simulation, according to:
Acceptance criteria
The already available APIs shall be kept for backward compatibility, but to ensure integrity of the new solution, they need to be converted to be a wrapper. There are some already open issues in sumo which relate to this topic, some examples: eclipse-sumo/sumo#6898 eclipse-sumo/sumo#6147 eclipse-sumo/sumo#4983 eclipse-sumo/sumo#6202 eclipse-sumo/sumo#1145 eclipse-sumo/sumo#2344 eclipse-sumo/sumo#2552 eclipse-sumo/sumo#2862 eclipse-sumo/sumo#3002
*Vehicle type parameters means all car following and lane change parameters independent form which CFM or LC is used
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
As a
Advanced User
I want to
use traci/sumolib as simulation controller with customised vehicle types
In order to
be able to control groups of vehicles simultaneously during simulation, according to:
Acceptance criteria
The already available APIs shall be kept for backward compatibility, but to ensure integrity of the new solution, they need to be converted to be a wrapper.
There are some already open issues in sumo which relate to this topic, some examples:
eclipse-sumo/sumo#6898
eclipse-sumo/sumo#6147
eclipse-sumo/sumo#4983
eclipse-sumo/sumo#6202
eclipse-sumo/sumo#1145
eclipse-sumo/sumo#2344
eclipse-sumo/sumo#2552
eclipse-sumo/sumo#2862
eclipse-sumo/sumo#3002
*Vehicle type parameters means all car following and lane change parameters independent form which CFM or LC is used
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: