Bring rich telemetry data to Provider Status Endpoint

[quicklywilliam]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

A remaining inconsistency between Agency and Provider is that the Status endpoint's location data does not include Speed data. This data could be useful in assessing regulatory compliance with speed rules. This data is currently present in Agency, so adding it to Provider would also create greater parity.

Describe the solution you'd like

Add the speed field to status events in Provider.

Is this a breaking change

No

Impacted Spec

• provider

Additional context

This issue was broken out from #589, which originally requested these data for both Provider endpoints.

[quicklywilliam]

I've filed this issue based on the possible use case of wanting to assess compliance with speed-related rules. There may be other regulatory use cases I am overlooking, please chime in if so!

[schnuerle]

For some more context, here is what is currently supported in Agency. Note the requirements are all listed as "Required if Available" from the provider.

https://github.com/openmobilityfoundation/mobility-data-specification/tree/release-1.1.0/agency#telemetry-data

Name	Type	Required?	Description
gps.lat	Double	Required	Latitude of the location
gps.lng	Double	Required	Longitude of the location
gps.altitude	Double	Required if Available	Altitude above mean sea level in meters
gps.heading	Double	Required if Available	Degrees - clockwise starting at 0 degrees at true North
gps.speed	Float	Required if Available	Speed in meters / sec
gps.accuracy	Float	Required if Available	Accuracy in meters
gps.hdop	Float	Required if Available	Horizontal GPS or GNSS accuracy value (see hdop)
gps.satellites	Integer	Required if Available	Number of GPS or GNSS satellites

[schnuerle]

We'll be talking about this at today's Working Group meeting.

[schnuerle]

Similar to #589, does anyone feel comfortable making a pull request for this, adding the Required if Available fields and others discussed to Provider Status Changes? There is a PR #73 but I think it's out of date (and the CLA needs to be signed). Could be the same PR.

[quicklywilliam]

Addressed by #653.