Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AOM-135: Display all Maintainers/Developers names on the addon page #132

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 1, 2018

Conversation

Charpell
Copy link
Contributor

JIRA TICKET NAME

AOM-135: Display all Maintainers/Developers names on the addon page

SUMMARY

Currently there is only one Maintainers/Developers name displayed when a user clicks the view button to see an add-on. In a situation where the Maintainers/Developers names are not completely displayed on the add-on manager page, it is necessary to display all the names in the add-on page.

This ticket aims to address this issue

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 31, 2018

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 584

  • 4 of 4 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • 22 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+1.08%) to 39.633%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
app/js/components/manageApps/Addon.jsx 22 39.44%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 578: 1.08%
Covered Lines: 181
Relevant Lines: 415

💛 - Coveralls

@justmesam
Copy link
Contributor

look goods to me 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@segunolalive segunolalive left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good

@@ -330,7 +336,7 @@ class Addon extends Component {
<div className="title-container">
<h3 id="addon-name">{app.name}</h3>
<p id="addon-description">{app.description}</p>
{app.uuid ?
{app.uid || app.uuid ?
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What are the cases where it is uid instead of uuid?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new response i am getting when i fetch modules is its uid and no longer uuid.
I left the uuid deliberately for future response

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ignore the future. We shall change it if that future comes.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, i have updated the PR

@Charpell Charpell force-pushed the AOM-135 branch 3 times, most recently from d72d7cb to 7941324 Compare February 1, 2018 15:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
5 participants