Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add conditional statement #271

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 20, 2024
Merged

add conditional statement #271

merged 6 commits into from
Feb 20, 2024

Conversation

CPernet
Copy link
Contributor

@CPernet CPernet commented Feb 15, 2024

ecat validation remains unchanged by adding this statement


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pet2bids--271.org.readthedocs.build/en/271/

ecat validation unchanged
Copy link
Contributor

@mnoergaard mnoergaard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me - I have asked @bendhouseart to carry out a few more tests also comparing with Turku's ecat2nii, so he might have additional feedback.

@CPernet
Copy link
Contributor Author

CPernet commented Feb 15, 2024

@mnoergaard actually needs to be the other way around -- all our phantoms seems calibrated !

@bendhouseart
Copy link
Contributor

bendhouseart commented Feb 15, 2024

It's beautiful

> In ecat2nii (line 334) 
Warning: it looks like the source data are already dose calibrated - ecat2nii is thus not scaling the data 
> In ecat2nii (line 339) 

@bendhouseart
Copy link
Contributor

Alright, the Nii's produced by this look like they're scaling to the same range as the original ecats viewed in Vinci and as the outputs from Turku. Below is a comparison of the the outputs from a previous commit on this branch compared to the current status 2165535 done in freeview:

Screenshot 2024-02-16 at 11 08 58 AM

Looks good to me 👍

@bendhouseart bendhouseart merged commit d860701 into main Feb 20, 2024
16 checks passed
@bendhouseart bendhouseart deleted the dose_calibration_scaling branch February 20, 2024 17:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants